Heberlein Emily C, Picklesimer Amy H, Billings Deborah L, Covington-Kolb Sarah, Farber Naomi, Frongillo Edward A
Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Health, Education, and Human Development, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Greenville Health System, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 890 W. Faris Road, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016 Apr;19(2):259-69. doi: 10.1007/s00737-015-0564-6. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
To compare the psychosocial outcomes of the CenteringPregnancy (CP) model of group prenatal care to individual prenatal care, we conducted a prospective cohort study of women who chose CP group (N = 124) or individual prenatal care (N = 124). Study participants completed the first survey at study recruitment (mean gestational age 12.5 weeks), with 89% completing the second survey (mean gestational age 32.7 weeks) and 84% completing the third survey (6 weeks' postpartum). Multiple linear regression models compared changes by prenatal care model in pregnancy-specific distress, prenatal planning-preparation and avoidance coping, perceived stress, affect and depressive symptoms, pregnancy-related empowerment, and postpartum maternal-infant attachment and maternal functioning. Using intention-to-treat models, group prenatal care participants demonstrated a 3.2 point greater increase (p < 0.05) in their use of prenatal planning-preparation coping strategies. While group participants did not demonstrate significantly greater positive outcomes in other measures, women who were at greater psychosocial risk benefitted from participation in group prenatal care. Among women reporting inadequate social support in early pregnancy, group participants demonstrated a 2.9 point greater decrease (p = 0.03) in pregnancy-specific distress in late pregnancy and 5.6 point higher mean maternal functioning scores postpartum (p = 0.03). Among women with high pregnancy-specific distress in early pregnancy, group participants had an 8.3 point greater increase (p < 0.01) in prenatal planning-preparation coping strategies in late pregnancy and a 4.9 point greater decrease (p = 0.02) in postpartum depressive symptom scores. This study provides further evidence that group prenatal care positively impacts the psychosocial well-being of women with greater stress or lower personal coping resources. Large randomized studies are needed to establish conclusively the biological and psychosocial benefits of group prenatal care for all women.
为比较集中孕期(CP)小组产前护理模式与个体产前护理的心理社会结局,我们对选择CP小组护理(N = 124)或个体产前护理(N = 124)的女性进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。研究参与者在研究招募时(平均孕周12.5周)完成了第一次调查,89%的参与者完成了第二次调查(平均孕周32.7周),84%的参与者完成了第三次调查(产后6周)。多元线性回归模型比较了产前护理模式在特定孕期困扰、产前计划准备和回避应对、感知压力、情绪和抑郁症状、与妊娠相关的赋权以及产后母婴依恋和母亲功能方面的变化。使用意向性分析模型,小组产前护理参与者在使用产前计划准备应对策略方面表现出增加3.2分(p < 0.05)。虽然小组参与者在其他指标上没有表现出显著更大的积极结局,但心理社会风险较高的女性从参与小组产前护理中受益。在孕早期报告社会支持不足的女性中,小组参与者在孕晚期特定孕期困扰方面表现出降低2.9分(p = 0.03),产后母亲功能平均得分高5.6分(p = 0.03)。在孕早期有高度特定孕期困扰的女性中,小组参与者在孕晚期产前计划准备应对策略方面增加8.3分(p < 0.01),产后抑郁症状得分降低4.9分(p = 0.02)。本研究提供了进一步的证据,表明小组产前护理对压力更大或个人应对资源较少的女性的心理社会福祉有积极影响。需要进行大型随机研究来最终确定小组产前护理对所有女性的生物学和心理社会益处。