Christopoulos Katerina A, Olender Susan, Lopez Andrea M, Lekas Helen-Maria, Jaiswal Jessica, Mellman Will, Geng Elvin, Koester Kimberly A
HIV/AIDS Division, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Columbia University Comprehensive HIV Program, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2015 Aug 11;12(8):e1001863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001863. eCollection 2015 Aug.
Patients retained in HIV care but not on antiretroviral therapy (ART) represent an important part of the HIV care cascade in the United States. Even in an era of more tolerable and efficacious ART, decision making in regards to ART offer and uptake remains complex and calls for exploration of both patient and provider perspectives. We sought to understand reasons for lack of ART usage in patients meeting the Health Resources Services Administration definition of retention as well as what motivated HIV primary care appointment attendance in the absence of ART.
We conducted a qualitative study consisting of 70 in-depth interviews with ART-naïve and ART-experienced patients off ART and their primary care providers in two urban safety-net HIV clinics in San Francisco and New York. Twenty patients and their providers were interviewed separately at baseline, and 15 dyads were interviewed again after at least 3 mo and another clinic visit in order to understand any ART use in the interim. We applied dyadic analysis to our data. Nearly all patients were willing to consider ART, and 40% of the sample went on ART, citing education on newer antiretroviral drugs, acceptance of HIV diagnosis, social support, and increased confidence in their ability to adhere as facilitators. However, the strength of the provider recommendation of ART played an important role. Many patients had internalized messages from providers that their health was too good to warrant ART. In addition, providers, while demonstrating patient-centered care through sensitivity to patients experiencing psychosocial instability, frequently muted the offer of ART, at times unintentionally. In the absence of ART, lab monitoring, provider relationships, access to social services, opiate pain medications, and acute symptoms motivated care. The main limitations of this study were that treatment as prevention was not explored in depth and that participants were recruited from academic HIV clinics in the US, making the findings most generalizable to this setting.
Provider communication with regard to ART is a key focus for further exploration and intervention in order to increase ART uptake for those retained in HIV care.
在美国,接受艾滋病病毒(HIV)护理但未接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的患者是HIV护理流程中的重要组成部分。即使在ART耐受性更好、疗效更佳的时代,关于提供和接受ART的决策仍然复杂,需要从患者和医护人员双方的角度进行探讨。我们试图了解符合卫生资源与服务管理局留存定义的患者未使用ART的原因,以及在未接受ART的情况下促使患者前往接受HIV初级护理的因素。
我们开展了一项定性研究,对旧金山和纽约两家城市安全网HIV诊所中未接受过ART以及有过ART经验但目前未接受治疗的患者及其初级护理人员进行了70次深度访谈。20名患者及其护理人员在基线时分别接受访谈,15对受访者在至少3个月后以及再次就诊后再次接受访谈,以了解在此期间是否开始使用ART。我们对数据进行了二元分析。几乎所有患者都愿意考虑接受ART,样本中的40%开始接受ART,他们提到对新型抗逆转录病毒药物的了解、对HIV诊断的接受、社会支持以及对自身坚持治疗能力信心的增强是促使他们接受治疗的因素。然而,医护人员对ART的推荐力度起着重要作用。许多患者从医护人员那里接收到这样的信息,即他们的健康状况良好,无需接受ART。此外,医护人员虽然通过对经历心理社会不稳定的患者表现出敏感性来展示以患者为中心的护理,但往往会弱化ART的提议,有时甚至是无意的。在未接受ART的情况下,实验室监测、与医护人员的关系、获得社会服务、阿片类止痛药物以及急性症状促使患者接受护理。本研究的主要局限性在于未深入探讨治疗即预防的问题,且参与者是从美国的学术性HIV诊所招募的,这使得研究结果最适用于这种环境。
医护人员关于ART的沟通是进一步探索和干预的关键重点,以便增加接受HIV护理的患者对ART的接受程度。