Arya V, Mahajan P, Saraf A, Mohanty A, Sawhney J P S, Bhargava M
Department of Haematology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Department of Cardiology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2015 Dec;37(6):809-18. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12416. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is the current standard of care in the management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The variability in response to these antiplatelet agents may be due to the underlying genetic diversity. This study was designed to determine the resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel in Indian patients and to look for correlation, if any, with selected polymorphisms.
Platelet function testing by light transmission aggregometry was performed on 72 patients with CAD/ACS who were stable on dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel 75 mg OD and aspirin 150 mg OD) along with 72 controls. Aspirin resistance was considered as mean platelet aggregation ≥ 70% with 10 μm ADP and ≥ 20% with 0.75 mm arachidonic acid. Clopidogrel resistance was defined as <10% decrease from the baseline in platelet aggregation in response to ADP 10 μm and semi-response as <30% decrease from the baseline. Polymorphisms CYP2C19*2, 3, CYP3A53 and PLA1/A2 were genotyped.
We found 51.4% patients with inadequate response to clopidogrel (1.4% resistant and 50% semi-responders) and 5.5% patients semi-responders to aspirin, none being completely resistant. The genotype and allele frequencies of CYP2C192 and PLA1/A2 gene polymorphisms were significantly different between clopidogrel semi-responders and responders. Carriers of CYP2C192 and CYP3A5*3 showed diminished inhibition of platelet aggregation. No significant correlation was found between coronary events, type of coronary intervention with clopidogrel nonresponsiveness.
Unlike aspirin, a high proportion of partial responders to clopidogrel were identified. In an interim analysis on 72 Indian patients, a significant association was found between CYP2C19*2 and PLA1/A2 in clopidogrel semi-responders.
氯吡格雷和阿司匹林联合抗血小板治疗是目前冠心病(CAD)和急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者管理的标准治疗方案。对这些抗血小板药物反应的变异性可能归因于潜在的基因多样性。本研究旨在确定印度患者对阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的抵抗情况,并寻找与所选多态性之间的相关性(若存在)。
对72例接受双联抗血小板治疗(氯吡格雷75mg每日一次和阿司匹林150mg每日一次)且病情稳定的CAD/ACS患者以及72例对照者进行光透射聚集法血小板功能检测。阿司匹林抵抗定义为用10μm ADP时平均血小板聚集≥70%,用0.75mm花生四烯酸时≥20%。氯吡格雷抵抗定义为对10μm ADP反应的血小板聚集较基线降低<10%,半反应为较基线降低<30%。对CYP2C19*2、3、CYP3A53和PLA1/A2多态性进行基因分型。
我们发现51.4%的患者对氯吡格雷反应不足(1.4%抵抗和50%半反应者),5.5%的患者对阿司匹林半反应,无完全抵抗者。氯吡格雷半反应者和反应者之间CYP2C192和PLA1/A2基因多态性的基因型和等位基因频率有显著差异。CYP2C192和CYP3A5*3携带者血小板聚集抑制减弱。未发现冠脉事件、冠脉介入类型与氯吡格雷无反应性之间有显著相关性。
与阿司匹林不同,发现有高比例的氯吡格雷部分反应者。在对72例印度患者的中期分析中,发现氯吡格雷半反应者中CYP2C19*2和PLA1/A2之间存在显著关联。