Baccarin Leandro Stocco, Casarin Renato Correa Viana, Lopes-da-Silva Jorge Vicente, Passeri Luis Augusto
Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences - Unicamp., Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Periodontics, Paulista University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2015 Sep;8(3):171-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393732. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
The aim of this study was to assess through biomechanical testing if different synthetic materials used to fabricate test specimens have a different biomechanical behavior in comparison with other materials when simulating in vitro load resistance of a fixation method established for sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Thirty synthetic and standardized human hemimandible replicas with SSRO were divided into three groups of 10 samples each. Group A-ABS plastic; Group B-polyamide; and Group C-polyurethane. These were fixated with three bicortical position screws (16 mm in length, 2.0-mm system) in an inverted l pattern using perforation guide and 5-mm advancement. Each sample was submitted to linear vertical load, and load strength values were recorded at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm of displacement. The means and standard deviation were compared using the analysis of variance (p < 0.05) and the Tukey test. A tendency for lower values was observed in Group B in comparison with Groups A and C. At 3 and 5 mm of displacement, a difference between Groups A and C was found in comparison with Group B (p < 0.05). At 7 and 10 mm of displacement, a difference was found among the three groups, in which Group C showed the highest values and Group B the lowest (p < 0.05). Taking into consideration the results obtained and the behavior of each material used as a substrate, significant differences occurred among the materials when compared among them.
本研究的目的是通过生物力学测试,评估用于制造测试样本的不同合成材料在模拟矢状劈开下颌支截骨术(SSRO)所建立的固定方法的体外抗负荷能力时,与其他材料相比是否具有不同的生物力学行为。30个带有SSRO的合成标准化人类半下颌骨复制体被分为三组,每组10个样本。A组-ABS塑料;B组-聚酰胺;C组-聚氨酯。使用穿孔导向器和5毫米推进量,以倒L形用三根双皮质定位螺钉(长度16毫米,2.0毫米系统)对其进行固定。每个样本承受线性垂直负荷,并在位移1、3、5、7和10毫米时记录负荷强度值。使用方差分析(p<0.05)和Tukey检验比较均值和标准差。与A组和C组相比,B组观察到较低值的趋势。在位移3和5毫米时,与B组相比,A组和C组之间存在差异(p<0.05)。在位移7和10毫米时,三组之间存在差异,其中C组显示的值最高,B组最低(p<0.05)。考虑到所获得的结果以及用作基质的每种材料的行为,当对这些材料进行相互比较时,它们之间存在显著差异。