• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌前徙矢状劈开截骨术不同固定技术的生物力学与光弹性比较评估

Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.

作者信息

Sato Fábio Ricardo Loureiro, Asprino Luciana, Consani Simonides, de Moraes Márcio

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Campinas State University-UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;68(1):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.004
PMID:20006171
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the resistance and tension areas created after load incidence in different varieties of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty synthetic polyurethane hemimandible replicas were subjected to linear loading tests to evaluate 4 fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 2-mm system plates and screws. The hemimandibles were fixed with three 90 degrees linear screws, three 60 degrees linear screws, 3 screws in a reversed L arrangement, and one titanium miniplate. Each group was subjected to linear loading using an Instron 4411 servohydraulic mechanical testing unit. The load peak value and peak displacement were measured. Another 4 hemimandible replicas were made of photoelastic resin and subjected to photoelastic analysis after linear loading with a 3-mm displacement.

RESULTS

The results of the mechanical tests showed statistically significant differences between the fixation groups. The linear 90 degrees fixation and the reversed L arrangement presented with greater loading resistance, followed by the linear 60 degrees fixation and miniplates. In relation to the stress distribution in the photoelastic analysis, the fringes were concentrated near the osteotomy and to the lower part of the mandible in the linear 90 degrees -screw system and reversed L arrangement. In the case of the linear 60 degrees screws, most fringes were located around and between the screws. In the case of the miniplates, the fringes were concentrated around the screws near the osteotomy and more distally.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions tested, the linear 90 degrees and reversed L arrangements provided the most favorable behavior.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较评估不同类型的矢状劈开下颌支截骨固定技术在加载后产生的阻力和张力区域。

材料与方法

五十个合成聚氨酯半下颌骨复制品接受线性加载测试,以评估使用2毫米系统钢板和螺钉的矢状劈开下颌支截骨的4种固定技术。半下颌骨用三个90度线性螺钉、三个60度线性螺钉、呈倒L形排列的3个螺钉和一个钛微型钢板固定。每组使用Instron 4411伺服液压机械测试单元进行线性加载。测量载荷峰值和峰值位移。另外4个半下颌骨复制品由光弹性树脂制成,并在3毫米位移的线性加载后进行光弹性分析。

结果

力学测试结果显示固定组之间存在统计学上的显著差异。90度线性固定和倒L形排列具有更大的抗载能力,其次是60度线性固定和微型钢板。关于光弹性分析中的应力分布,条纹集中在截骨部位附近以及90度线性螺钉系统和倒L形排列的下颌骨下部。对于60度线性螺钉,大多数条纹位于螺钉周围和之间。对于微型钢板,条纹集中在截骨部位附近和更远端的螺钉周围。

结论

在测试条件下,90度线性和倒L形排列表现出最有利的性能。

相似文献

1
Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.下颌前徙矢状劈开截骨术不同固定技术的生物力学与光弹性比较评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;68(1):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.004.
2
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:前徙手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.009.
3
An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.一种可调节骨固定系统的体外比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Nov;63(11):1620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.06.008.
4
A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.双侧矢状支截骨固定技术的生物力学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Sep;63(9):1317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.301.
5
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.传统与锁定微型钢板/螺钉系统用于下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的体外生物力学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;68(4):724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.018. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
6
Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.三维有限元分析比较五种不同矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术的固定技术。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;41(8):934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 15.
7
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:后退手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):941-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.106. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
8
Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.使用三维有限元分析比较矢状劈开下颌升支截骨术后不同固定方法。第1部分:前徙术-后向加载
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jul;34(5):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.10.009.
9
A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.下颌髁突骨折接骨板固定技术的比较生物力学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Mar;64(3):452-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.017.
10
A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis.对下颌前突矢状劈开截骨术的机械、光弹和有限元分析的混合固定技术的比较评价。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Nov;114(5 Suppl):S60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.08.027. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of two stable internal fixation techniques in mandibular ramus sagittal osteotomy: a three-dimensional finite element study.下颌支矢状劈开截骨术中两种稳定内固定技术的评估:三维有限元研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Feb 27;29(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01357-z.
2
Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods Combinations After L-Shaped Osteotomy Reduction Malarplasty: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study.评价 L 形截骨后颧骨整形术不同固定方法组合:一项体外生物力学研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Aug;48(16):3170-3179. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03960-z. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
采用三维有限元分析法对当前和新型设计的下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术微型接骨板固定技术的比较评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
4
Assessment of Resorbable and Non-resorbable Fixation Systems in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: An In vitro Study.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术中可吸收与不可吸收固定系统的评估:一项体外研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Sep;21(3):779-784. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01581-6. Epub 2021 May 2.
5
Biomechanical Evaluation of Seven Fixation Methods for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Four Advancement Levels by Finite Element Analysis.通过有限元分析对矢状劈开下颌支截骨术四种前移水平的七种固定方法进行生物力学评估。
Front Surg. 2022 May 4;9:891747. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.891747. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An study.双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后五种内固定方法的强度比较:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Aug 14;17(4):258-265. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
7
Analysis of Mandibular Test Specimens Used to Assess a Bone Fixation System.用于评估骨固定系统的下颌骨测试样本分析
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2015 Sep;8(3):171-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393732. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
8
Photoelastic evaluation of two different sagittal split ramus osteotomies in advancement surgery.矢状劈开截骨术在推进手术中两种不同方式的光弹性评估
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Aug 15;7(8):1940-4. eCollection 2014.
9
Influence of the design in sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the mechanical behavior.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术中设计对力学行为的影响。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 May 15;7(5):1284-8. eCollection 2014.
10
TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.TMJ 对下颌前伸手术的反应:风险因素概述。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-14. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130056.