Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia.
Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, Victoria 3053, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Oct 30;229(3):819-27. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.084. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
Variable outcomes in first-episode psychosis (FEP) are partly attributable to heterogeneity in cognitive functioning. To aid identification of those likely to have poorer or better outcomes, we examined whether purported cognitive profiles identified through use of cluster analysis in chronic schizophrenia were evident in FEP. We also aimed to assess whether there was a relationship between cognitive profile and factors independent of the solution, providing external validation that the cognitive profiles represented distinct subgroups. Ward's method hierarchical cluster analysis, verified by a k-means cluster solution, was performed using data obtained from a cognitive test battery administered to 128 participants aged 15-25 years. Four cognitive profiles were identified. A continuity element was evident; participants in cluster four were more cognitively impaired compared to participants in cluster three, who appeared more cognitively intact. Clusters one and two were distinguishable across measures of attention and working memory and visual recognition memory, most likely reflecting sample specific patterns of deficit. Participants in cluster four had significantly lower premorbid and current IQ and higher negative symptoms compared to participants in cluster three. The distinct levels and patterns of cognition found in chronic schizophrenia cohorts are also evident across diagnostic categories in FEP.
首发精神病(FEP)的结果多变部分归因于认知功能的异质性。为了帮助确定那些预后较差或较好的患者,我们研究了慢性精神分裂症中使用聚类分析确定的所谓认知特征是否在 FEP 中明显。我们还旨在评估认知特征与独立于解决方案的因素之间是否存在关系,从而提供认知特征代表不同亚组的外部验证。使用对 128 名年龄在 15-25 岁的参与者进行的认知测试组合获得的数据,通过 Ward 方法分层聚类分析(通过 k-均值聚类解决方案验证)来进行。确定了四个认知特征。连续元素明显存在;与认知更完整的第三组相比,第四组的参与者认知受损更严重。一组和二组在注意力和工作记忆以及视觉识别记忆的测量中可区分,这很可能反映了样本特定的缺陷模式。与第三组相比,第四组的参与者在病前和当前智商较低,阴性症状较高。在 FEP 中,在首发精神病和慢性精神分裂症队列中发现的不同水平和模式的认知也很明显。