Huang Yuyan, Wang Weiyan, Hei Gangrui, Shao Tiannan, Li Li, Yang Ye, Wang Xiaoyi, Long Yujun, Xiao Jingmei, Peng Xingjie, Song Chuhan, Cai Jingda, Song Xueqin, Xu Xijia, Gao Shuzhan, Huang Jing, Kang Dongyu, Wang Ying, Zhao Jingping, Pan Yunzhi, Wu Renrong
Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
BMC Med. 2025 Jan 8;23(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03835-9.
The heterogeneity of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia has been widely observed. However, reliable cognitive boundaries to differentiate the subgroups remain elusive. The key challenge for cognitive subtyping is applying an integrated and standardized cognitive assessment and understanding the subgroup-specific neurobiological mechanisms. The present study endeavors to explore cognitive subgroups and identify their morphological features.
A total of 920 schizophrenia patients and 169 healthy controls were recruited. MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery was applied to assess cognitive performance and recognize cognitive subgroups through latent profile and latent transition analysis. Cortical thickness and gray matter volume were employed for the morphological features across subgroups.
Four reproducible cognitive subgroups were identified, including multidomain-intact, executive-preserved, executive-deteriorated, and multidomain-deteriorated subgroup. After 12 weeks of follow-up, the cognitive characteristics of three out of the four subgroups kept stability, except for multidomain-deteriorated subgroup in which 48.8% of patients with improved cognition transited into the executive-deteriorated subgroup. Across subgroups, significant gradient features of brain structure were exhibited in fronto-temporal regions, hippocampus, and insula. Compared to healthy controls, multidomain-intact subgroup showed the most intact cognition and morphology, and multidomain-deteriorated subgroup with youngest age showed morphological decline in extensive regions. The remaining two subgroups showed intermediate cognitive performance, but could be distinguished by executive function and morphological differences in posterior cingulate cortex.
Our study provides novel insights into the heterogeneity of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia and the morphological features from cross-sectional and longitudinal levels, which could advance our understanding of complex cognition-morphology relationships and guide personalized interventions.
精神分裂症认知障碍的异质性已被广泛观察到。然而,区分亚组的可靠认知界限仍然难以捉摸。认知亚型划分的关键挑战在于应用综合且标准化的认知评估,并理解亚组特异性神经生物学机制。本研究旨在探索认知亚组并确定其形态学特征。
共招募了920例精神分裂症患者和169名健康对照者。应用MATRICS共识认知成套测验评估认知表现,并通过潜在类别分析和潜在转变分析识别认知亚组。采用皮质厚度和灰质体积来研究各亚组的形态学特征。
识别出四个可重复的认知亚组,包括多领域完整、执行功能保留、执行功能衰退和多领域衰退亚组。随访12周后,四个亚组中的三个亚组的认知特征保持稳定,除了多领域衰退亚组,该亚组中48.8%认知改善的患者转变为执行功能衰退亚组。在各亚组中,额颞叶区域、海马体和脑岛表现出显著的脑结构梯度特征。与健康对照相比,多领域完整亚组的认知和形态最为完整,年龄最小的多领域衰退亚组在广泛区域出现形态学衰退。其余两个亚组表现出中等认知表现,但可通过执行功能以及后扣带回皮质的形态学差异来区分。
我们的研究为精神分裂症认知障碍的异质性以及横断面和纵向水平的形态学特征提供了新的见解,这可能会增进我们对复杂的认知 - 形态关系的理解,并指导个性化干预。