Freire Elizabeth, Williams Christopher, Messow Claudia-Martina, Cooper Mick, Elliott Robert, McConnachie Alex, Walker Andrew, Heard Deborah, Morrison Jill
Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Research Center in Spirituality and Health - NUPES School of Medicine, Av. Eugênio do Nascimento s/n°, Bairro Dom Bosco, CEP: 36038-330, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Psychosocial Psychiatry, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Administration Building Gartnavel Royal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0XH, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 15;15:197. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0582-y.
Persistent depressive symptoms below the threshold criteria for major depression represent a chronic condition with high risk of progression to a diagnosis of major depression. The evidence base for psychological treatments such as Person-Centred Counselling and Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for sub-threshold depressive symptoms and mild depression is limited, particularly for longer-term outcomes.
This study aimed to test the feasibility of delivering a randomised controlled trial into the clinical and cost effectiveness of Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioural Therapy versus Person-Centred Counselling for patients with persistent sub-threshold depressive symptoms and mild depression. The primary outcome measures for this pilot/feasibility trial were recruitment, adherence and retention rates at six months from baseline. An important secondary outcome measure was recovery from, or prevention of, depression at six months assessed via a structured clinical interview by an independent assessor blind to the participant's treatment condition. Thirty-six patients were recruited in five general practices and were randomised to either eight weekly sessions of person-centred counselling each lasting up to an hour, or up to eight weeks of cognitive-behavioural self-help resources with guided telephone support sessions lasting 20-30 minutes each.
Recruitment rate in relation to the number of patients approached at the general practices was 1.8 %. Patients attended an average of 5.5 sessions in both interventions. Retention rate for the 6-month follow-up assessments was 72.2 %. Of participants assessed at six months, 71.4 % of participants with a diagnosis of mild depression at baseline had recovered, while 66.7 % with a diagnosis of persistent subthreshold depression at baseline had not developed major depression. There were no significant differences between treatment groups for both recovery and prevention of depression at six months or on any of the outcome measures.
It is feasible to recruit participants and successfully deliver both interventions in a primary care setting to patients with subthreshold and mild depression; however recruiting requires significant input at the general practices. The evidence from this study suggests that short-term Person-Centred Counselling and Low-Intensity Cognitive Behaviour Therapy are potentially effective and their effectiveness should be evaluated in a larger randomised controlled study which includes a health economic evaluation.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN60972025 .
低于重度抑郁症阈值标准的持续性抑郁症状代表一种慢性病,发展为重度抑郁症诊断的风险很高。以患者为中心的咨询和低强度认知行为疗法等心理治疗对于阈下抑郁症状和轻度抑郁症的证据基础有限,尤其是对于长期疗效。
本研究旨在测试针对持续性阈下抑郁症状和轻度抑郁症患者开展一项关于低强度认知行为疗法与以患者为中心的咨询的临床及成本效益的随机对照试验的可行性。这项试点/可行性试验的主要结局指标是自基线起六个月时的招募率、依从率和保留率。一项重要的次要结局指标是在六个月时通过独立评估者进行的结构化临床访谈评估的抑郁症康复或预防情况,该评估者对参与者的治疗情况不知情。在五个全科诊所招募了36名患者,并将他们随机分为两组,一组接受为期八周、每次长达一小时的以患者为中心的咨询,另一组接受长达八周的认知行为自助资源,并辅以每次持续20 - 30分钟的电话指导支持课程。
相对于在全科诊所接触的患者数量,招募率为1.8%。两种干预措施中患者平均参加了5.5次课程。六个月随访评估的保留率为72.2%。在六个月时接受评估的参与者中,基线时被诊断为轻度抑郁症的参与者中有71.4%康复,而基线时被诊断为持续性阈下抑郁症的参与者中有66.7%未发展为重度抑郁症。在六个月时抑郁症的康复和预防方面以及任何结局指标上,治疗组之间均无显著差异。
在基层医疗环境中招募参与者并成功为阈下和轻度抑郁症患者提供这两种干预措施是可行的;然而,在全科诊所进行招募需要大量投入。本研究的证据表明,短期的以患者为中心的咨询和低强度认知行为疗法可能有效,其有效性应在一项更大的随机对照研究中进行评估,该研究应包括卫生经济学评估。
当前受控试验ISRCTN60972025 。