Karkou Vicky, Aithal Supritha, Zubala Ania, Meekums Bonnie
Faculty of Health and Social Care, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.
Department of Performing Arts, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 3;10:936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00936. eCollection 2019.
Depression is the largest cause of mental ill health worldwide. Although interventions such as Dance Movement Therapy (DMT) may offer interesting and acceptable treatment options, current clinical guidelines do not include these interventions in their recommendations mainly because of what is perceived as insufficient research evidence. The 2015 Cochrane review on DMT for depression includes only three studies leading to inconclusive results. In a small and underfunded field such as DMT, expensive multi-centered Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are as yet rare. It is therefore, necessary to not only capture evidence from RCTs, but to also look beyond such designs in order to identify and assess the range of current evidence. We therefore conducted a systematic review of studies that aimed to explore the effectiveness in the use of DMT with people with depression. This led to a qualitative narrative synthesis. We also performed meta-analyses that calculated the effect size for all included studies, studies with RCT designs only, followed by a subgroup analysis and a sensitivity analysis. In all meta-analyses a random effects model was used with Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) to accommodate for the heterogeneity of studies and outcome measures. From the 817 studies reviewed, eight studies were identified as meeting our inclusion criteria. Three hundred and fifty one people with depression (mild to severe) participated, 192 of whom attended DMT groups while receiving treatment as usual (TAU) and 159 received TAU only. Qualitative findings suggest there was a decrease in depression scores in favor of DMT groups in all studies. Subgroup analysis performed on depression scores before and 3 months after the completion of DMT groups suggested changes in favor of the DMT groups. When sensitivity analysis was performed, RCTs at high risk of bias were excluded, leaving only studies with adult clients up to the age of 65. In these studies, the highest effect size was found favoring DMT plus TAU for adults with depression, when compared to TAU only. Based on studies with moderate to high quality, we concluded that DMT is an effective intervention in the treatment of adults with depression. Furthermore, by drawing on a wide range of designs with diverse quality, we were able to compile a comprehensive picture of relevant trends relating to the use of DMT in the treatment of depression. Despite the fact that there remains a paucity of high-quality studies, the results have relevance to both policy-making and clinical practice, and become a platform for further research.
抑郁症是全球心理健康问题的最大诱因。尽管诸如舞蹈动作疗法(DMT)等干预措施可能提供有趣且可接受的治疗选择,但目前的临床指南在其推荐中并未纳入这些干预措施,主要原因是人们认为研究证据不足。2015年考科蓝协作网关于DMT治疗抑郁症的综述仅纳入了三项研究,结果尚无定论。在像DMT这样规模小且资金不足的领域,昂贵的多中心随机对照试验(RCT)仍然很少见。因此,不仅有必要从随机对照试验中获取证据,还需要超越此类设计,以识别和评估当前证据的范围。因此,我们对旨在探索DMT对抑郁症患者疗效的研究进行了系统综述。这促成了一项定性叙述性综合分析。我们还进行了荟萃分析,计算了所有纳入研究、仅采用随机对照试验设计的研究的效应量,随后进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析。在所有荟萃分析中,使用随机效应模型和标准化均数差(SMD)来处理研究和结果测量的异质性。在 reviewed 的817项研究中,有八项研究符合我们的纳入标准。351名抑郁症患者(轻度至重度)参与其中,其中192人在接受常规治疗(TAU)的同时参加了DMT组,159人仅接受了常规治疗。定性研究结果表明,在所有研究中,抑郁症评分均有所下降,有利于DMT组。对DMT组结束前和结束后3个月的抑郁症评分进行的亚组分析表明,变化有利于DMT组。进行敏感性分析时,排除了存在高偏倚风险的随机对照试验, 仅保留了针对65岁及以下成年患者的研究。在这些研究中,与仅接受常规治疗相比,发现对伴有抑郁症的成年人使用DMT加常规治疗的效应量最高。基于质量中等至高的研究,我们得出结论,DMT是治疗成年抑郁症患者的有效干预措施。此外,通过借鉴广泛的不同质量的设计,我们能够汇总出与使用DMT治疗抑郁症相关趋势的全面情况。尽管高质量研究仍然匮乏,但研究结果与政策制定和临床实践都相关,并成为进一步研究的平台。