Suppr超能文献

国际生活质量研究协会对欧洲药品管理局关于在肿瘤学研究中使用患者报告结局(PRO)指标的反思文件草案的评论。

International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies.

作者信息

Kyte Derek, Reeve Bryce B, Efficace Fabio, Haywood Kirstie, Mercieca-Bebber Rebecca, King Madeleine T, Norquist Josephine M, Lenderking William R, Snyder Claire, Ring Lena, Velikova Galina, Calvert Melanie

机构信息

Primary Care and Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2016 Feb;25(2):359-362. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1099-z. Epub 2015 Aug 15.

Abstract

In 2014, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released for comment a draft reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies. A twelve-member International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) taskforce was convened to coordinate the ISOQOL response. Twenty-one ISOQOL members provided detailed comments and suggestions on the paper: 81 % from academia and 19 % from industry. Taskforce members consolidated and further refined these comments and shared the recommendations with the wider ISOQOL membership. A final response was submitted to the EMA in November 2014. The impending publication of the EMA reflection paper presents a valuable opportunity for ISOQOL to comment on the current direction of EMA PRO guidance and strategy. The EMA paper, although focused on cancer, could serve as a model for using PROs in other conditions, as it provides a useful update surrounding some of the design issues common to all trial research including PRO endpoints. However, we believe there are a number of additional areas in need of greater consideration. The purpose of this commentary is therefore to highlight the strengths of this timely and potentially useful document, but also to outline areas that may warrant further discussion.

摘要

2014年,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)发布了一份关于在肿瘤学研究中使用患者报告结局(PRO)指标的反思文件草案以供评论。一个由12名成员组成的国际生活质量研究协会(ISOQOL)特别工作组被召集起来协调ISOQOL的回应。21名ISOQOL成员对该文件提供了详细的评论和建议:81%来自学术界,19%来自行业。特别工作组成员整合并进一步完善了这些评论,并与更广泛的ISOQOL成员分享了这些建议。最终的回应于2014年11月提交给了EMA。EMA反思文件即将发布,这为ISOQOL提供了一个宝贵的机会,对EMA关于PRO的指导和策略的当前方向发表评论。EMA的文件虽然侧重于癌症,但可以作为在其他疾病中使用PRO的一个范例,因为它围绕所有试验研究共有的一些设计问题(包括PRO终点)提供了有益的更新。然而,我们认为还有一些其他领域需要更多的考虑。因此,本评论的目的是突出这份及时且可能有用的文件的优点,同时也概述可能需要进一步讨论的领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验