• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因暂时病情过重而处于既往非活跃状态的等待名单候选人的肾移植结果

Renal Transplant Outcomes in Waitlist Candidates with a Previous Inactive Status Due to Being Temporarily Too Sick.

作者信息

Leeaphorn Napat, Sampaio Marcelo S, Natal Naowanit, Mehrnia Alireza, Kamgar Mandana, Huang Edmund, Kalantar-Zadeh Kamyar, Kaplan Bruce, Bunnapradist Suphamai

出版信息

Clin Transpl. 2014:117-24.

PMID:26281135
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2003, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) changed its policy to allow candidates with 'inactive' status to accrue time on the waitlist. In this study, we assessed the transplant outcomes among deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients who were temporarily inactive specifically due to medical reason, i.e., being temporarily too sick (reason 7).

METHODS

Using the UNOS database, adult DDKT recipients were divided into two groups: those who had never been inactivated (active group) and those with a history of being inactive due to reason 7 (reason 7 group). Patient and graft survival, 3-year risk of death, and graft failure were examined and compared.

RESULTS

After 3 years of follow-up, patient survival in the reason 7 group was significantly lower than that of the active group (88.14% versus 91.93%, p < 0.01). The reason 7 group had a 20% increased risk of death (hazard ratio, HR 1.20, confidence interval, CI 1.04 - 1.38), a 16% increase in graft failure (HR 1.16, CI 1.06-1.28), and a 15% decrease in death-censored graft failure (HR 1.15, CI 1.01-1.31).

CONCLUSION

Recipients with a history of reason 7 have lower patient and graft survival when compared to the active group. Nonetheless, the margins of difference are minimal. Candidates with a history of reason 7 should not be discouraged from transplantation once they return to active status. Standardized criteria for placing candidates on inactive status should be developed to reduce disparities among transplant centers.

摘要

背景

2003年,器官共享联合网络(UNOS)改变了其政策,允许处于“非活跃”状态的候选人在等待名单上累计时间。在本研究中,我们评估了因医疗原因(即暂时病情过重,原因7)而暂时处于非活跃状态的已故供体肾移植(DDKT)受者的移植结局。

方法

利用UNOS数据库,将成年DDKT受者分为两组:从未处于非活跃状态的受者(活跃组)和因原因7有非活跃状态病史的受者(原因7组)。对患者和移植物存活率、3年死亡风险和移植物失败情况进行检查和比较。

结果

经过3年的随访,原因7组的患者存活率显著低于活跃组(88.14%对91.93%,p<0.01)。原因7组的死亡风险增加20%(风险比,HR 1.20,置信区间,CI 1.04 - 1.38),移植物失败风险增加16%(HR 1.16,CI 1.06 - 1.28),死亡审查后的移植物失败风险降低15%(HR 1.15,CI 1.01 - 1.31)。

结论

与活跃组相比,有原因7病史的受者的患者和移植物存活率较低。尽管如此,差异幅度很小。有原因7病史的候选人一旦恢复活跃状态,不应被劝阻进行移植。应制定将候选人置于非活跃状态的标准化标准,以减少移植中心之间的差异。

相似文献

1
Renal Transplant Outcomes in Waitlist Candidates with a Previous Inactive Status Due to Being Temporarily Too Sick.因暂时病情过重而处于既往非活跃状态的等待名单候选人的肾移植结果
Clin Transpl. 2014:117-24.
2
Survival Benefit in Older Patients Associated With Earlier Transplant With High KDPI Kidneys.高KDPI肾脏早期移植对老年患者的生存益处。
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):867-872. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001405.
3
Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: an analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database.70岁及以上已故肾脏供体的患者和移植物结局:器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络数据库分析
Transplantation. 2008 Jun 15;85(11):1573-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31817059a1.
4
Survival Benefit of Transplantation with a Deceased Diabetic Donor Kidney Compared with Remaining on the Waitlist.与继续等待相比,接受糖尿病死亡供者肾脏移植的生存获益
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):974-982. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10280916. Epub 2017 May 25.
5
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国胰腺移植病例的结果。
Clin Transpl. 2008:45-56.
6
Prediction of kidney transplant outcome by donor quality scoring systems: expanded criteria donor and deceased donor score.通过供体质量评分系统预测肾移植结果:扩大标准供体和脑死亡供体评分
Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2555-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.061.
7
Incidence of conversion to active waitlist status among temporarily inactive obese renal transplant candidates.肥胖的肾移植候选者中暂时不活跃转为积极候补状态的发生率。
Transplantation. 2014 Jul 27;98(2):177-86. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000037.
8
Kidney transplantation in the United States.美国的肾脏移植
Clin Transpl. 2008:1-18.
9
The UNOS Renal Transplant Registry: Review of the Last Decade.美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处:过去十年回顾
Clin Transpl. 2014:1-12.
10
What has changed in more than 40 years of activity and 3000 kidney transplants at Policlinico University Hospital, Milan.在米兰大学综合医院超过40年的活动以及3000例肾脏移植手术中,发生了哪些变化。
Clin Transpl. 2011:99-110.

引用本文的文献

1
Waitlist management for inactive status kidney transplant patients: a scoping review.非活跃状态肾移植患者的等待名单管理:一项范围综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Mar 7;87(4):2204-2211. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003137. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Association of the Affordable Care Act on Access to and Outcomes After Kidney or Liver Transplant: A Transplant Registry Study.平价医疗法案对肾或肝移植后获得和结果的影响:移植登记研究。
Transplant Proc. 2023 Jan-Feb;55(1):56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.12.008. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
3
The impact of systematic review of status 7 patients on the kidney transplant waitlist.
状态 7 患者系统综述对肾移植候补名单的影响。
BMC Nephrol. 2019 May 16;20(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1362-6.