Pothmann Harald, Erlen Alexander, Pichler Martina, Huber Johann, Drillich Marc
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2015 Jul-Aug;128(7-8):319-25.
The determination of the body condition of dairy cows is a helpful instrument to assess the energy situation of individual cows and herds. Two methods for determining the body condition are well established in bovine practice, body condition scoring (BCS) and measurement of backfat thickness (BFT). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the repeatability of BCS on a five-point scale with 0.25-points increments and the measurement of BFT by ultrasound (5 MHz linear probe) as well as the repeatability of measuring BFT at both sides of the cows back. Five investigators with different experience with BCS and BFT assessed a total of 94 cows repeatedly, resulting in 1806 BCS-measurements and 1723 (left) and 1733 (right) BFT-values. Weighted kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement of repeated measurements and correlations were calculated for linear associations. Within-observer agreement of BCS and BFT was good for both methods (K = 0.67 and 0.78, respectively). Agreement was moderate to substantial for BCS and BFT depending on the investigator. Within-observer agreement of BFT at the right and left body side was substantial (K = 0.75). There was a high correlation between repeated measurements of BCS and BFT (r = 0.93 and r(c) = 0.91, respectively), and between BFT measured at the left and right body side (r(c) = 0.90). The correlation between BCS and BFT was moderate (r = 0.67). Overall, both methods demonstrated good repeatability applied by different investigators. In summary, BCS and BFT measurements are practical tools to contribute beneficially to herd health management.
确定奶牛的体况是评估个体奶牛和牛群能量状况的一种有用手段。在牛的实践中,有两种确定体况的方法已得到广泛应用,即体况评分(BCS)和背膘厚度(BFT)测量。本研究的目的是评估以0.25分为增量的五点量表BCS的重复性、通过超声(5MHz线性探头)测量BFT的重复性以及在奶牛背部两侧测量BFT的重复性。五名在BCS和BFT方面经验不同的研究人员对总共94头奶牛进行了重复评估,共得到1806次BCS测量结果以及1723次(左侧)和1733次(右侧)BFT值。使用加权kappa系数评估重复测量的一致性,并计算线性关联的相关性。两种方法的观察者内部BCS和BFT一致性均良好(K分别为0.67和0.78)。根据研究人员的不同,BCS和BFT的一致性为中等至高度。观察者内部左右身体侧BFT的一致性较高(K = 0.75)。BCS和BFT的重复测量之间以及左右身体侧测量的BFT之间存在高度相关性(r分别为0.93和rc为0.91),BCS和BFT之间的相关性为中等(r = 0.67)。总体而言,两种方法在不同研究人员的应用中都显示出良好的重复性。总之,BCS和BFT测量是有助于牛群健康管理的实用工具。