Suppr超能文献

不同检查人员对南美骆驼科动物体况评分(BCS)的影响——来自骆马和羊驼混群的经验

The influence of different examiners on the Body Condition Score (BCS) in South American camelids-Experiences from a mixed llama and alpaca herd.

作者信息

Wagener Matthias Gerhard, Schregel Johannes, Ossowski Nina, Trojakowska Anna, Ganter Martin, Kiene Frederik

机构信息

Clinic for Swine, Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2023 Feb 3;10:1126399. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1126399. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Particularly in unshorn llamas and alpacas with a dense fiber coat, changes in body condition often remain undetected for a long time. Manual palpation of the lumbar vertebrae is hence a simple and practical method for the objective assessment of body condition in South American camelids (SAC). Depending on tissue coverage, a body condition score (BCS) of 1 (emaciated) to 5 (obese) with an optimum of 3 is assigned. To date, there is a lack of detailed information on the comparability of the results when the BCS in llamas or alpacas is assessed by different examiners. Reliability of BCS assessment of 20 llamas and nine alpacas during a veterinary herd visit by six examiners was hence evaluated in this study. A gold standard BCS (gsBCS) was calculated from the results of the two most experienced examiners. The other examiners deviated by a maximum of 0.5 score points from the gsBCS in more than 80% of the animals. Inter-rater reliability statistics between the assessors were comparable to those in body condition scoring in sheep and cattle ( = 0.52-0.89; τ = 0.43-0.80; κ = 0.50-0.79). Agreements were higher among the more experienced assessors. Based on the results, the assessment of BCS in SAC by palpation of the lumbar vertebrae can be considered as a simple and reproducible method to reliably determine nutritional status in llamas and alpacas.

摘要

特别是对于毛发浓密的未剪毛美洲驼和羊驼,身体状况的变化往往长时间难以被察觉。因此,手动触诊腰椎是客观评估南美骆驼科动物(SAC)身体状况的一种简单实用的方法。根据组织覆盖情况,身体状况评分(BCS)从1(消瘦)到5(肥胖),最佳状态为3。迄今为止,当不同检查人员评估美洲驼或羊驼的BCS时,关于结果可比性的详细信息还很缺乏。因此,本研究评估了六位检查人员在兽医群体检查期间对20只美洲驼和9只羊驼进行BCS评估的可靠性。根据两位经验最丰富的检查人员的结果计算出金标准BCS(gsBCS)。在超过80%的动物中,其他检查人员与gsBCS的最大偏差为0.5分。评估人员之间的评分者间可靠性统计与绵羊和牛的身体状况评分结果相当( = 0.52 - 0.89;τ = 0.43 - 0.80;κ = 0.50 - 0.79)。经验更丰富的评估人员之间的一致性更高。基于这些结果,通过触诊腰椎来评估SAC的BCS可被视为一种简单且可重复的方法,用于可靠地确定美洲驼和羊驼的营养状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb70/9936059/93e6a9dbece1/fvets-10-1126399-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验