Leding Juliana K
a Department of Psychology , University of North Florida , Jacksonville , FL 32224 , USA.
Memory. 2016 Jul;24(6):792-800. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1051052. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
In the memory conjunction paradigm, the number of times that constituents of conjunction lures were studied and the method of presentation were varied. In two experiments, participants were presented with eight parent items that could be recombined at test to form a conjunction lure. The constituents that were shared between the parent items and the conjunction lures were either presented in the same words (e.g., blackmail and jailbird presented four times each for the conjunction lure blackbird) or in different words (e.g., the targets footstool, footlocker, foothill, footbridge, baseball, softball, basketball, and golfball for the conjunction lure football). In both experiments, rates of false recognition were higher in the Different condition as opposed to the Same condition. These results provide evidence that participants in the Same condition were able to utilise a recall-to-reject strategy by remembering the repeatedly presented parent word. In the Different condition, participants were not able to utilise that strategy and instead relied on the familiarity of the repeatedly presented constituents which led to higher rates of false recognition.
在记忆联结范式中，联结诱饵成分的学习次数和呈现方式有所不同。在两个实验中，向参与者呈现八个母项，这些母项在测试时可以重新组合形成一个联结诱饵。母项和联结诱饵之间共享的成分要么用相同的词呈现（例如，“blackmail”和“jailbird”每个都为联结诱饵“blackbird”呈现四次），要么用不同的词呈现（例如，目标词“footstool”、“footlocker”、“foothill”、“footbridge”、“baseball”、“softball”、“basketball”和“golfball”用于联结诱饵“football”）。在两个实验中，与“相同”条件相比，“不同”条件下的错误识别率更高。这些结果表明，“相同”条件下的参与者能够通过记住重复呈现的母词来采用回忆-拒绝策略。在“不同”条件下，参与者无法采用该策略，而是依赖于重复呈现成分的熟悉度，这导致了更高的错误识别率。
