• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精细加工与识别记忆中的合取错误。

Elaborative processing and conjunction errors in recognition memory.

作者信息

Arndt Jason, Jones Todd C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):899-912. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.5.899.

DOI:10.3758/mc.36.5.899
PMID:18630197
Abstract

Four experiments were conducted in order to examine the influence of elaborative processing at encoding on recognition memory conjunction lure errors. In these experiments, participants generated cues for compound words as wholes (e.g., haywire) or as separate entities (e.g., hay, wire). Studied words were re-presented in exact form (old) or recombined to form conjunction lures on the recognition test. Participants were asked to make old-new judgments and to indicate whether they had rejected items judged to be new because of recall of a studied item or because of lack of familiarity with an item. The results suggested that recall-to-reject processing and conjunction lure familiarity increased with both types of generation, although generation of cues for compound words as a whole did not influence conjunction lure error rates. An emphasis on processing each constituent of a compound word during encoding increased the familiarity of those constituents more than generation of a compound word as a whole, resulting in an increase in conjunction lure errors. These results suggest that both familiarity and recollection-based monitoring processes influence conjunction lure errors, and therefore support dual-process theories of recognition memory.

摘要

为了检验编码时的精细加工对识别记忆中合取诱饵错误的影响,进行了四项实验。在这些实验中,参与者为复合词整体(如haywire)或作为单独的实体(如hay、wire)生成线索。学习过的单词在识别测试中以精确的形式重新呈现(旧词)或重新组合形成合取诱饵。要求参与者做出新旧判断,并指出他们是否因为回忆起一个学习过的项目或因为对一个项目不熟悉而拒绝判断为新的项目。结果表明,回忆-拒绝加工和合取诱饵熟悉度在两种生成类型中都有所增加,尽管将复合词作为一个整体生成线索并不会影响合取诱饵错误率。在编码过程中强调对复合词的每个组成部分进行加工,比对复合词整体进行生成更能增加这些组成部分的熟悉度,从而导致合取诱饵错误增加。这些结果表明,熟悉度和基于回忆的监测过程都会影响合取诱饵错误,因此支持识别记忆的双加工理论。

相似文献

1
Elaborative processing and conjunction errors in recognition memory.精细加工与识别记忆中的合取错误。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):899-912. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.5.899.
2
Memory conjunction clusters: Influence of familiarity and recollection.记忆联结簇:熟悉度与回忆的影响
Memory. 2016 Jul;24(6):792-800. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1051052. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
3
Conjunction errors and semantic transparency.连接错误与语义透明度。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):47-56. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.47.
4
Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: little evidence for recollection.连续识别记忆测试中的合取错误率:回忆的证据不足。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Mar;28(2):374-9.
5
When false recognition is out of control: the case of facial conjunctions.当错误识别失控时:面部联合的案例
Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):143-57. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.2.143.
6
Not all sources of familiarity are created equal: the case of word frequency and repetition in episodic recognition.并非所有熟悉度的来源都是平等的:情节识别中词频和重复的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jul;39(5):791-805. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0069-5.
7
Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults.老年人虚假面部识别的认知机制。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):54-60. doi: 10.1037/a0024582. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
8
Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):70-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.70.
9
Editing (out) generated study words in a recognition exclusion task: Effects of response signal delay and generation procedure.在识别排除任务中编辑(删除)生成的研究词汇:反应信号延迟和生成程序的影响。
Memory. 2006 Aug;14(6):712-29. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648480.
10
The memory conjunction error paradigm: normative data for conjunction triplets.
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Nov;39(4):920-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03192987.

引用本文的文献

1
Autobiographical memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Evidence for a role of inhibitory ability.年轻人和老年人的自传体记忆联结错误:抑制能力作用的证据
Psychol Aging. 2016 Dec;31(8):927-942. doi: 10.1037/pag0000129.
2
Pre-stimulus neural activity predicts successful encoding of inter-item associations.刺激前神经活动可预测项目间关联的成功编码。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.046. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
3
When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?何时以及为何检索尝试会增强随后的编码?

本文引用的文献

1
Feature and conjunction effects in recognition memory: toward specifying familiarity for compound words.识别记忆中的特征与联结效应:迈向明确复合词的熟悉度
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jul;35(5):984-98. doi: 10.3758/bf03193471.
2
Editing (out) generated study words in a recognition exclusion task: Effects of response signal delay and generation procedure.在识别排除任务中编辑(删除)生成的研究词汇:反应信号延迟和生成程序的影响。
Memory. 2006 Aug;14(6):712-29. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648480.
3
Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.
Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):505-13. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0.
4
Conjunction errors and semantic transparency.连接错误与语义透明度。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):47-56. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.47.
5
When false recognition is out of control: the case of facial conjunctions.当错误识别失控时:面部联合的案例
Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):143-57. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.2.143.
识别模型:对支持双过程理论观点的综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):1-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03193807.
4
Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):70-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.70.
5
Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures.研究重复与对合取谬误的拒绝。
Memory. 2005 Jul;13(5):499-515. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000197.
6
Remember-know: a matter of confidence.记住——知晓:关乎信心。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):524-42. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.524.
7
Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.记忆联结范式中的稳健记忆抑制
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):332-42. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.332.
8
Using recall to reduce false recognition: diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.利用回忆减少错误识别:诊断性和排除性监测。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):120-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.120.
9
Recollection rejection: false-memory editing in children and adults.回忆拒绝:儿童和成人中的错误记忆编辑
Psychol Rev. 2003 Oct;110(4):762-84. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.762.
10
Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: little evidence for recollection.连续识别记忆测试中的合取错误率:回忆的证据不足。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Mar;28(2):374-9.