Yang Kun, Lu Zheng-Hao, Zhang Wei-Han, Liu Kai, Chen Xin-Zu, Chen Xiao-Long, Guo Dong-Jiao, Zhou Zong-Guang, Hu Jian-Kun
From the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (KY, Z-HL, W-HZ, KL, X-ZC, X-LC, D-JG, Z-GZ, J-KH) and Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China (KY, Z-HL, W-HZ, KL, X-ZC, X-LC, D-JG, J-KH).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(33):e1305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001305.
To compare the effectiveness and safety of in-vivo dissection procedure of No. 10 lymph nodes with those of ex-vivo dissection procedure for gastric cancer patients with total gastrectomy.Patients were divided into in-vivo group and ex-vivo group according to whether the dissection of No. 10 lymph nodes were performed after the mobilization of the pancreas and spleen, and migration out from peritoneal cavity. Clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival, morbidity, and mortality were compared between the 2 groups.There were 148 patients in in-vivo group, while 30 in ex-vivo group. The baselines between the 2 groups were almost comparable. The metastatic ratio of No. 10 lymph nodes were 6.1% and 10.0% (P = 0.435) and the metastatic degree were 7.9% and 13.6% (P = 0.158) for in-vivo group and ex-vivo group, respectively. There was no difference in morbidity or mortality between the 2 groups. The number of total harvested lymph nodes and No. 10 lymph nodes increased significantly in ex-vivo group at the cost of prolonged operation time. The estimated overall survival rates for patients in in-vivo group and ex-vivo group were (3-year: 52.0% vs 61.8%) and (5-year: 45.3% vs 49.5%), respectively, without statistical significance. Further multivariable analysis had showed that the procedure of No. 10 lymphadenectomy was not a significant independent prognostic factor.Both in-vivo and ex-vivo dissection of No. 10 lymph nodes could be performed safely. It seems that ex-vivo dissection of No. 10 lymph nodes can result in a higher effective dissection at the cost of the operation time, but the overall survival rates were not statistically significant between the 2 groups, which should be confirmed further in a well-designed randomized controlled trial.
比较全胃切除的胃癌患者体内法与体外法清扫第10组淋巴结的有效性和安全性。根据第10组淋巴结清扫是否在胰脾游离并移出腹腔后进行,将患者分为体内组和体外组。比较两组患者的临床病理特征、总生存率、发病率和死亡率。体内组有148例患者,体外组有30例患者。两组基线基本可比。体内组和体外组第10组淋巴结转移率分别为6.1%和10.0%(P = 0.435),转移程度分别为7.9%和13.6%(P = 0.158)。两组发病率和死亡率无差异。体外组以延长手术时间为代价,总收获淋巴结数和第10组淋巴结数显著增加。体内组和体外组患者的估计总生存率分别为(3年:52.0%对61.8%)和(5年:45.3%对49.5%),无统计学意义。进一步多变量分析表明,第10组淋巴结清扫术不是显著的独立预后因素。体内和体外清扫第10组淋巴结均可安全进行。体外清扫第10组淋巴结似乎能以手术时间为代价实现更高的有效清扫,但两组总生存率无统计学意义,这应在精心设计的随机对照试验中进一步证实。