Suppr超能文献

全胃切除的胃癌患者10组淋巴结清扫不同术式的比较

Comparisons Between Different Procedures of No. 10 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer Patients With Total Gastrectomy.

作者信息

Yang Kun, Lu Zheng-Hao, Zhang Wei-Han, Liu Kai, Chen Xin-Zu, Chen Xiao-Long, Guo Dong-Jiao, Zhou Zong-Guang, Hu Jian-Kun

机构信息

From the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (KY, Z-HL, W-HZ, KL, X-ZC, X-LC, D-JG, Z-GZ, J-KH) and Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China (KY, Z-HL, W-HZ, KL, X-ZC, X-LC, D-JG, J-KH).

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(33):e1305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001305.

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness and safety of in-vivo dissection procedure of No. 10 lymph nodes with those of ex-vivo dissection procedure for gastric cancer patients with total gastrectomy.Patients were divided into in-vivo group and ex-vivo group according to whether the dissection of No. 10 lymph nodes were performed after the mobilization of the pancreas and spleen, and migration out from peritoneal cavity. Clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival, morbidity, and mortality were compared between the 2 groups.There were 148 patients in in-vivo group, while 30 in ex-vivo group. The baselines between the 2 groups were almost comparable. The metastatic ratio of No. 10 lymph nodes were 6.1% and 10.0% (P = 0.435) and the metastatic degree were 7.9% and 13.6% (P = 0.158) for in-vivo group and ex-vivo group, respectively. There was no difference in morbidity or mortality between the 2 groups. The number of total harvested lymph nodes and No. 10 lymph nodes increased significantly in ex-vivo group at the cost of prolonged operation time. The estimated overall survival rates for patients in in-vivo group and ex-vivo group were (3-year: 52.0% vs 61.8%) and (5-year: 45.3% vs 49.5%), respectively, without statistical significance. Further multivariable analysis had showed that the procedure of No. 10 lymphadenectomy was not a significant independent prognostic factor.Both in-vivo and ex-vivo dissection of No. 10 lymph nodes could be performed safely. It seems that ex-vivo dissection of No. 10 lymph nodes can result in a higher effective dissection at the cost of the operation time, but the overall survival rates were not statistically significant between the 2 groups, which should be confirmed further in a well-designed randomized controlled trial.

摘要

比较全胃切除的胃癌患者体内法与体外法清扫第10组淋巴结的有效性和安全性。根据第10组淋巴结清扫是否在胰脾游离并移出腹腔后进行,将患者分为体内组和体外组。比较两组患者的临床病理特征、总生存率、发病率和死亡率。体内组有148例患者,体外组有30例患者。两组基线基本可比。体内组和体外组第10组淋巴结转移率分别为6.1%和10.0%(P = 0.435),转移程度分别为7.9%和13.6%(P = 0.158)。两组发病率和死亡率无差异。体外组以延长手术时间为代价,总收获淋巴结数和第10组淋巴结数显著增加。体内组和体外组患者的估计总生存率分别为(3年:52.0%对61.8%)和(5年:45.3%对49.5%),无统计学意义。进一步多变量分析表明,第10组淋巴结清扫术不是显著的独立预后因素。体内和体外清扫第10组淋巴结均可安全进行。体外清扫第10组淋巴结似乎能以手术时间为代价实现更高的有效清扫,但两组总生存率无统计学意义,这应在精心设计的随机对照试验中进一步证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fc1/4616434/609714fe5d00/medi-94-e1305-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
5
Ex Vivo Lymphadenectomy During Gastrectomy for Adenocarcinoma Optimizes Lymph Node Yield.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan;20(1):165-71; discussion 171. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2948-3. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
7
Survival benefit and safety of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with total gastrectomy.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov;93(25):e158. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000158.
8
Lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: prognostic role and therapeutic implications.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002 Jun;28(4):406-12. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1247.
10
Safety and Feasibility of No.12a Lymph Node Dissection by Portal Vein Approach in Radical Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820971277. doi: 10.1177/1533033820971277.

引用本文的文献

2
Ex Situ In Vivo Technique of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Dissection in Operable Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;13(3):481-487. doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01487-2. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
4
Silencing of CHFR Sensitizes Gastric Carcinoma to PARP Inhibitor Treatment.
Transl Oncol. 2020 Jan;13(1):113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
Robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2357-2363. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06772-4. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
Comparisons of short-term and survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 10;8(32):52366-52380. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17019. eCollection 2017 Aug 8.
7
A positive crosstalk between CXCR4 and CXCR2 promotes gastric cancer metastasis.
Oncogene. 2017 Sep 7;36(36):5122-5133. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.108. Epub 2017 May 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Survival benefit and safety of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with total gastrectomy.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov;93(25):e158. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000158.
3
Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in 108 consecutive patients with upper gastric cancer.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 28;20(32):11376-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11376.
4
Metastasis, risk factors and prognostic significance of splenic hilar lymph nodes in gastric adenocarcinoma.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 10;9(6):e99650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099650. eCollection 2014.
6
Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):101-12. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5.
7
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-23. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4.
8
Global cancer statistics.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
9
Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: incidence, characteristics, and treatment strategies.
Gastric Cancer. 2010 Jun;13(2):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s10120-010-0555-2. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
10
Effectiveness and safety of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov 14;15(42):5352-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5352.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验