Suppr超能文献

不同任务中体表和带状阻抗心动图电极的比较。

Comparison of spot and band impedance cardiogram electrodes across different tasks.

作者信息

Boomsma D I, de Vries J, Orlebeke J F

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 1989 Nov;26(6):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb03174.x.

Abstract

Impedance cardiography has become of widespread interest as a noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring technique. This study compared the use of spot electrodes and two different types of band electrodes in the determination of systolic time intervals and stroke volume. EKG, impedance cardiogram, and phonocardiogram were recorded on 12 volunteers during rest, during a reaction time task, and after a short exercise task. Systolic time intervals (pre-ejection period and left ventricular ejection time) were computed on a beat-to-beat basis and on the ensemble-averaged signals. The only differences between spot and band electrodes were for impedance base level and electrode conductance. For stroke volume and the systolic time interval measures there were no differences between electrode arrays, nor were there any interactions with tasks. Correlations for stroke volume and systolic time interval measures as determined under different electrode conditions were around .8.

摘要

阻抗心动图作为一种无创心血管监测技术已引起广泛关注。本研究比较了在测定收缩期时间间期和每搏输出量时使用点状电极和两种不同类型的带状电极的情况。在12名志愿者休息时、进行反应时间任务期间以及短时间运动任务后,记录了心电图、阻抗心动图和心音图。逐搏计算收缩期时间间期(射血前期和左心室射血时间)以及对整体平均信号进行计算。点状电极和带状电极之间的唯一差异在于阻抗基线水平和电极电导。对于每搏输出量和收缩期时间间期测量,电极阵列之间没有差异,任务之间也没有相互作用。在不同电极条件下测定的每搏输出量和收缩期时间间期测量的相关性约为0.8。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验