• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用HEART研究质量指标评估巴西辅助技术的服务提供系统。

Assessing Service Delivery Systems for Assitive Technology in Brazil using HEART Study quality indicators.

作者信息

Maximo Tulio, Clift Laurence

机构信息

Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:478-84.

PMID:26294516
Abstract

BACKGROUND

recently in Brazil, there have been investments and improvements in the service delivery system for assistive technology provision. However, there is little documentation of this process, or evidence that users are being involved appropriately.

OBJECTIVE

to understand how a ssistive technology service provision currently functions in Belo Horizonte city, Brazil, in order to provide context-specific interventions and recommendations to improve services.

METHOD

Qualitative research design, including visits to key institutions and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Interview questions were divided with two purposes: 1) Exploratory, aiming to understand present service functioning; 2) Evaluative, aiming to assess staff difficulties in applying best existing best practices.

RESULTS

Assistive Technology services in Belo Horizonte fall under the 'medical model' definition of service delivery developed by AAATE. It was also found that staff lack training and knowledge support to assess user requirements and involve them during the decision process. Additionally, there is no follow up stage after the device is delivered.

CONCLUSIONS

The study clearly defines the service provision function and the staff difficulties at Belo Horizonte city, providing information for further studies.

摘要

背景

最近在巴西,辅助技术提供的服务交付系统有了投资和改进。然而,关于这一过程的记录很少,也没有证据表明用户得到了适当的参与。

目的

了解巴西贝洛奥里藏特市目前辅助技术服务的提供方式,以便提供针对具体情况的干预措施和建议来改善服务。

方法

定性研究设计,包括走访关键机构以及与关键利益相关者进行半结构化访谈。访谈问题分为两个目的:1)探索性的,旨在了解当前服务的运作情况;2)评估性的,旨在评估工作人员在应用现有最佳实践方面的困难。

结果

贝洛奥里藏特的辅助技术服务属于AAATE制定的“医疗模式”服务交付定义范畴。还发现工作人员缺乏评估用户需求并在决策过程中让用户参与的培训和知识支持。此外,设备交付后没有后续跟进阶段。

结论

该研究明确界定了贝洛奥里藏特市的服务提供功能和工作人员面临的困难,为进一步研究提供了信息。

相似文献

1
Assessing Service Delivery Systems for Assitive Technology in Brazil using HEART Study quality indicators.使用HEART研究质量指标评估巴西辅助技术的服务提供系统。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:478-84.
2
Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: stakeholder perspectives and preferences.辅助技术服务提供模式的特点:利益相关者的观点和偏好
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Dec 30;27(24):1461-70. doi: 10.1080/09638280500264535.
3
How to Accomplish the Assistive Technology Service Delivery Process for Adults in Order to Obtain the Best Outcomes - A Literature Review.如何为成人完成辅助技术服务提供过程以获得最佳结果——一项文献综述
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:469-77.
4
Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it.辅助产品的废弃:评估废弃水平及影响其的因素。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Oct;13(7):716-723. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1425748. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
5
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
6
Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment.意大利的辅助技术提供:感知到的交付过程质量对遗弃情况的影响
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(1):22-31. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.930191. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
7
Provision of assistive technology services method (ATSM) according to evidence-based information and knowledge management.根据循证信息和知识管理提供辅助技术服务方法(ATSM)。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):386-401. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.557763. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
8
The role of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and quality criteria for improving assistive technology service delivery in Europe.国际功能、残疾和健康分类在欧洲改善辅助技术服务提供中的作用和质量标准。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Feb;91(13 Suppl 1):S55-61. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31823d4ee6.
9
What factors are associated with the provision of assistive technologies: the Bogotá D.C. case.提供辅助技术与哪些因素相关:以哥伦比亚特区波哥大为例。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Sep;9(5):432-44. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.936053. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
10
A Brief Introduction of Assistive Technology Service Delivery System in Republic of Korea.韩国辅助技术服务提供系统简介。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:991-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons learned from health system rehabilitation preparedness and response for disasters in LMICs: a scoping review.从中等收入国家灾害卫生系统康复准备和应对中吸取的经验教训:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17992-2.
2
Assistive technology, information asymmetry and the role of brokerage services: a scoping review.辅助技术、信息不对称与中介服务的角色:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 27;12(12):e063938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063938.
3
Understanding the Global Challenges to Accessing Appropriate Wheelchairs: Position Paper.
了解获取合适轮椅的全球挑战:立场文件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 24;18(7):3338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073338.