von Tigerstrom Barbara
Food Drug Law J. 2015;70(2):315-37, iii.
The regulation of stem cell-based therapies is challenging in many respects, given their unique safety, efficacy, and quality issues. At the same time, public interest in these innovative therapies has led some to question FDA's regulation of them, while others urge strict regulation and stronger enforcement. Within the context of this broader debate, this article examines recent attempts in other jurisdictions to craft specific provisions allowing additional flexibility in regulating cell and tissue therapies: Australia's exemption for autologous cell and tissue therapies, and the hospital exemption in Europe's regulation for advanced therapies.
鉴于基于干细胞的疗法存在独特的安全性、有效性和质量问题,对其进行监管在许多方面都具有挑战性。与此同时,公众对这些创新疗法的关注引发了一些人对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对其监管的质疑,而另一些人则敦促进行严格监管并加强执法。在这场更广泛辩论的背景下,本文审视了其他司法管辖区最近为制定特定条款所做的尝试,这些条款允许在监管细胞和组织疗法方面具有更大灵活性:澳大利亚对自体细胞和组织疗法的豁免,以及欧洲先进疗法法规中的医院豁免。