Bernstein Adam M, Song Mingyang, Zhang Xuehong, Pan An, Wang Molin, Fuchs Charles S, Le Ngoan, Chan Andrew T, Willett Walter C, Ogino Shuji, Giovannucci Edward L, Wu Kana
Rally Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 25;10(8):e0135959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135959. eCollection 2015.
Although the association between red meat consumption and colorectal cancer (CRC) is well established, the association across subsites of the colon and rectum remains uncertain, as does time of consumption in relation to cancer development. As these relationships are key for understanding the pathogenesis of CRC, they were examined in two large cohorts with repeated dietary measures over time, the Nurses' Health Study (n = 87,108 women, 1980-2010) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (n = 47,389 men, 1986-2010). Cox proportional hazards regression models generated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. In combined cohorts, there were 2,731 CRC cases (1,151 proximal colon, 816 distal colon, and 589 rectum). In pooled analyses, processed red meat was positively associated with CRC risk (per 1 serving/day increase: HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32; P for trend 0.03) and particularly with distal colon cancer (per 1 serving/day increase; HR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09-1.69; P for trend 0.006). Recent consumption of processed meat (within the past 4 years) was not associated with distal cancer. Unprocessed red meat was inversely associated with risk of distal colon cancer and a weak non-significant positive association between unprocessed red meat and proximal cancer was observed (per 1 serving/day increase: distal HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.68-0.82; P for trend <0.001; proximal HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.92-1.40; P for trend 0.22). Thus, in these two large cohorts of US health professionals, processed meat intake was positively associated with risk of CRC, particularly distal cancer, with little evidence that higher intake of unprocessed red meat substantially increased risk of CRC. Future studies, particularly those with sufficient sample size to assess associations by subsites across the colon are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate potentially distinct mechanisms underlying the relationship between processed meat and subtypes of unprocessed red meat with CRC.
尽管红肉消费与结直肠癌(CRC)之间的关联已得到充分证实,但结肠和直肠各亚部位之间的关联仍不确定,红肉消费时间与癌症发生的关系也不明确。由于这些关系对于理解结直肠癌的发病机制至关重要,因此在两项随着时间推移进行多次饮食测量的大型队列研究中对其进行了考察,即护士健康研究(n = 87,108名女性,1980 - 2010年)和卫生专业人员随访研究(n = 47,389名男性,1986 - 2010年)。Cox比例风险回归模型生成风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs),并通过随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。在合并队列中,有2731例结直肠癌病例(1151例近端结肠癌、816例远端结肠癌和589例直肠癌)。在汇总分析中,加工红肉与结直肠癌风险呈正相关(每增加1份/天:HR = 1.15,95% CI:1.01 - 1.32;趋势P值为0.03),尤其与远端结肠癌相关(每增加1份/天;HR = 1.36;95% CI:1.09 - 1.69;趋势P值为0.006)。近期(过去4年内)食用加工肉类与远端癌症无关。未加工红肉与远端结肠癌风险呈负相关,并且观察到未加工红肉与近端癌症之间存在微弱的非显著正相关(每增加1份/天:远端HR = 0.75;95% CI:0.68 - 0.82;趋势P值<0.001;近端HR = 1.14,95% CI:0.92 - 1.40;趋势P值为0.22)。因此,在这两项由美国卫生专业人员组成的大型队列研究中,加工肉类摄入量与结直肠癌风险呈正相关,尤其是远端癌症,几乎没有证据表明未加工红肉摄入量的增加会大幅增加结直肠癌风险。未来的研究,特别是那些有足够样本量以评估结肠各亚部位关联的研究,需要证实这些发现并阐明加工肉类和未加工红肉亚型与结直肠癌之间关系背后潜在的不同机制。