Ren Hong, Ren Guoli, Sun Limin, Fan Xiuhua, Wang Yuran, Li Xiaoxi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
Email:
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 May;50(5):367-73.
To investigate the production and mechanism of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5) by macrophages in U14 cervical cancer-bearing mice during infection.
The U14 cervical cancer cells were injected in C57BL/6 mice to induce tumor-bearing condition. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was injected into C57BL/6 mice to induce infection. The protein expression of CCL5 in the serum and the CCL5 mRNA expression in inflammatory cells were measured by ELISA and fluorescence quantitative-PCR in four groups. Macrophages were induced in the tumor conditioned medium (TCM) which extracted from mice serum. The protein expression levels of CCL5, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the medium and CCL5, PGE2 and cAMP mRNA expression in the macrophages were detected in different groups. In order to determine whether the inhibition was related to PGE2, selective cyclooxygenase 2(COX-2) inhibitor NS398 was used to reverse this phenomenon and protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor H89 demonstrated the mechanism through blocking cAMP/PKA signaling pathway.
(1) The protein and mRNA level of CCL5 in tumor-bearing mice were respectively (151 ± 35) pg/ml and 1.0, which were lower than those in the tumor-free mice (691 ± 85) pg/ml and 4.5 ± 0.8, there were significant difference between them (all P < 0.05). The protein and mRNA level of PGE2 in tumor-bearing mice were (1 198 ± 83) pg/ml and 5.8 ± 0.8, which were higher than those in the tumor-free mice (187 ± 25) pg/ml and 1.0, the difference were significant (all P < 0.05). The protein and mRNA level of CCL5 in tumor-free + LPS mice were (4 049 ± 141) pg/ml and 31.5 ± 2.0, which were higher than those in the tumor-bearing + LPS mice (1 951 ± 71) pg/ml and 12.1 ± 2.8, the difference were also significant (P < 0.05). The protein and mRNA level of PGE2 in tumor-free + LPS mice were (676 ± 70) pg/ml and 3.4 ± 0.4, which were lower than those in tumor-bearing + LPS mice (2 550 ± 382) pg/ml and 11.6 ± 0.9, the difference were also significant (all P < 0.05). (2) Macrophages were cultured in vitro using TCM derived from mice. The protein and mRNA level of CCL5 in tumor-bearing mice TCM were respectively (1 626 ± 177) pg/ml and 28.6 ± 1.2, which were higher than those in the tumor-free mice TCM [(27 ± 3) pg/ml and 1.0], there were significant difference (P < 0.05). The protein and mRNA level of PGE2 in tumor-bearing mice TCM were (790 ± 156) pg/ml and 1.7 ± 0.3, which were higher than those in the tumor-free mice TCM [(448 ± 115) pg/ml, 1.0], the difference were significant (all P < 0.05). The protein and mRNA level of cAMP in tumor-bearing mice TCM were (164 ± 30) pg/ml and 1.6 ± 0.3, which weres higher than those in the tumor-free mice TCM [(118 ± 25) pg/ml,1.0], the difference were significant (all P < 0.05). The protein and mRNA level of CCL5 in tumor-free + LPS mice TCM were (10 475 ± 742) pg/ml and 212.0 ± 5.7, which were higher than those in the tumor-bearing + LPS mice TCM [(6 375 ± 530) pg/ml, 142.3 ± 2.5], the difference were significant (all P < 0.05). The protein and mRNA level of PGE2 in tumor-free + LPS mice TCM were (2 438 ± 95) pg/ml and 4.3 ± 0.7, which weres lower than those in the tumor-bearing + LPS mice TCM [(3 441 ± 163) pg/ml, 5.9 ± 0.3], the difference were significant (all P < 0.05). The protein and mRNA level of cAMP in tumor-free + LPS mice TCM were (340 ± 13) pg/ml and 4.1 ± 0.4, which were lower than those in the tumor-bearing + LPS mice TCM [(542 ± 42) pg/ml, 5.4 ± 0.5], the difference were significant (all P < 0.05). (3) Using COX-2 inhibitor NS398 in the tumor-bearing + LPS mice, the protein and mRNA level of CCL5, PGE2 and cAMP were (7 691 ± 269) pg/ml and 159.0 ± 8.9, (2 820 ± 152) pg/ml and 4.9 ± 0.3, (465 ± 8) pg/ml and 4.3 ± 0.4, respectively, and there were significant difference (all P < 0.05), compared to before treatment. Using PKA inhibitor H89 in the tumor-bearing + LPS mice, the protein and mRNA level of CCL5, PGE2 and cAMP were (8 375 ± 520) pg/ml and 177.0 ± 8.8, (2 650 ± 35) pg/ml and 4.7 ± 0.4, (368 ± 13) pg/ml and 3.1 ± 0.7, respectively, and there were significant difference (all P < 0.05), compared to before treatment.
TCM of U14 cells activated macrophages to release PGE2 could inhibit the expression of CCL5 levels by cAMP/PKA signaling pathway.
探讨U14宫颈癌荷瘤小鼠感染过程中巨噬细胞趋化因子(C-C基序)配体5(CCL5)的产生及机制。
将U14宫颈癌细胞注入C57BL/6小鼠诱导荷瘤状态。将脂多糖(LPS)注入C57BL/6小鼠诱导感染。采用ELISA和荧光定量PCR检测四组血清中CCL5蛋白表达及炎症细胞中CCL5 mRNA表达。从小鼠血清中提取肿瘤条件培养基(TCM)诱导巨噬细胞。检测不同组培养基中CCL5、前列腺素E2(PGE2)和环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)的蛋白表达水平以及巨噬细胞中CCL5、PGE2和cAMP mRNA表达。为确定抑制作用是否与PGE2有关,使用选择性环氧化酶2(COX-2)抑制剂NS398逆转这一现象,蛋白激酶A(PKA)抑制剂H89通过阻断cAMP/PKA信号通路阐明机制。
(1)荷瘤小鼠CCL5的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(151±35)pg/ml和1.0,低于无瘤小鼠的(691±85)pg/ml和4.5±0.8,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。荷瘤小鼠PGE2的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(1 198±83)pg/ml和5.8±0.8,高于无瘤小鼠的(187±25)pg/ml和1.0,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。无瘤+LPS小鼠CCL5的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(4 049±141)pg/ml和31.5±2.0,高于荷瘤+LPS小鼠的(1 951±71)pg/ml和12.1±2.8,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。无瘤+LPS小鼠PGE2的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(676±70)pg/ml和3.4±0.4,低于荷瘤+LPS小鼠的(2 550±382)pg/ml和11.6±0.9,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。(2)用小鼠来源的TCM体外培养巨噬细胞。荷瘤小鼠TCM中CCL5的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(1 626±177)pg/ml和28.6±1.2,高于无瘤小鼠TCM的[(27±3)pg/ml和1.0],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。荷瘤小鼠TCM中PGE2的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(790±156)pg/ml和1.7±0.3,高于无瘤小鼠TCM的[(448±115)pg/ml,1.0],差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。荷瘤小鼠TCM中cAMP的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(164±30)pg/ml和1.6±0.3,高于无瘤小鼠TCM的[(118±25)pg/ml,1.0],差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。无瘤+LPS小鼠TCM中CCL5的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(10 475±742)pg/ml和212.0±5.7,高于荷瘤+LPS小鼠TCM的[(6 375±530)pg/ml,142.3±2.5],差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。无瘤+LPS小鼠TCM中PGE2的蛋白和mRNA水平分别为(2 438±95)pg/ml和4.3±0.7,低于荷瘤+LPS小鼠TCM的[(3 441±163)pg/ml,5.9±