Drynan Eleanor A, Schier Mara, Raisis Anthea L
Department of Anaesthesia, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University Murdoch, Murdoch, Australia.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016 May;43(3):301-8. doi: 10.1111/vaa.12297. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
To determine the bias and precision of noninvasive versus invasive blood pressure measurements obtained using the Surgivet V9203 in anaesthetized horses; to compare these with the current American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Hypertension Consensus Panel (AHCP) and Veterinary Blood Pressure Society (VBPS) recommendations; and to investigate whether noninvasive blood pressure monitoring could be a clinically useful alternative to invasive blood pressure monitoring in anaesthetized horses.
Prospective clinical study in a university teaching hospital.
Forty-three horses with an average weight of 485 ± 90 kg and a mean age of 103.4 ± 57.6 months.
Arterial blood pressure (BP) was measured noninvasively (NIBP) via a cuff placed over either the ventral coccygeal artery or the metacarpal artery, and invasively (IBP) via a catheter in either the facial artery or the metatarsal artery. A total of 143 paired readings were obtained. Comparison of measurements was carried out using the Bland-Altman method. Analysis was performed using all the data, and these data were subdivided according to the position of the horse and the magnitude of the pressure measurement. To determine the accuracy of the noninvasive measurements, the calculated precision and bias were compared with AHCP and VBPS guidelines.
For all categories, NIBP measurements were generally lower than IBP measurements. For pooled data, the bias and precision for systolic arterial pressure (SAP) were 6.8 and 11.9 mmHg; for mean arterial pressure (MAP) the values were 1.9 and 10.0 mmHg; and for diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) they were 5.7 and 10.8 mmHg. The bias and precision for MAP and DAP measurements were within the recommended guidelines defined by the AHCP and VBPS.
These results suggests that systolic, mean and diastolic NIBP measured using the Surgivet V9203 are a clinically acceptable alternative to IBP measurements in anaesthetized horses undergoing routine elective surgeries.
确定使用Surgivet V9203在麻醉马匹中进行无创与有创血压测量的偏差和精密度;将这些结果与当前美国兽医内科学会高血压共识小组(AHCP)和兽医血压协会(VBPS)的建议进行比较;并研究在麻醉马匹中无创血压监测是否可作为有创血压监测的一种临床有用替代方法。
在大学教学医院进行的前瞻性临床研究。
43匹马,平均体重485±90千克,平均年龄103.4±57.6个月。
通过置于尾腹动脉或掌骨动脉上的袖带进行无创动脉血压(NIBP)测量,并通过面动脉或跖动脉中的导管进行有创动脉血压(IBP)测量。共获得143对读数。使用Bland-Altman方法进行测量比较。使用所有数据进行分析,并根据马匹的体位和压力测量值大小对这些数据进行细分。为确定无创测量的准确性,将计算出的精密度和偏差与AHCP和VBPS指南进行比较。
对于所有类别,NIBP测量值通常低于IBP测量值。对于汇总数据,收缩压(SAP)的偏差和精密度分别为6.8和11.9 mmHg;平均动脉压(MAP)的值分别为1.9和10.0 mmHg;舒张压(DAP)的值分别为5.7和10.8 mmHg。MAP和DAP测量的偏差和精密度在AHCP和VBPS定义的推荐指南范围内。
这些结果表明,对于接受常规择期手术的麻醉马匹,使用Surgivet V9203测量的收缩压、平均动脉压和舒张压无创血压是有创血压测量的临床可接受替代方法。