Badhiwala Jetan H, Hong Chris J, Nassiri Farshad, Hong Brian Y, Riva-Cambrin Jay, Kulkarni Abhaya V
Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Nov;16(5):545-555. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14630. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
OBJECT The optimal clinical management of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and posthemorrhagic ventricular dilation (PHVD)/posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) in premature infants remains unclear. A common approach involves temporary treatment of hydrocephalus in these patients with a ventriculosubgaleal shunt (VSGS), ventricular access device (VAD), or external ventricular drain (EVD) until it becomes evident that the patient needs and can tolerate permanent CSF diversion (i.e., ventriculoperitoneal shunt). The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a robust and comprehensive summary of the published literature regarding the clinical outcomes and complications of these 3 techniques as temporizing measures in the management of prematurity-related PHVD/PHH. METHODS The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library for studies published through December 2013 on the use of VSGSs, VADs, and/or EVDs as temporizing devices for the treatment of hydrocephalus following IVH in the premature neonate. Data pertaining to patient demographic data, study methods, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from eligible articles. For each of the 3 types of temporizing device, the authors performed meta-analyses examining 6 outcomes of interest, which were rates of 1) obstruction; 2) infection; 3) arrest of hydrocephalus (i.e., permanent shunt independence); 4) mortality; 5) good neurodevelopmental outcome; and 6) revision. RESULTS Thirty-nine studies, representing 1502 patients, met eligibility criteria. All of the included articles were observational studies; 36 were retrospective and 3 were prospective designs. Nine studies (n = 295) examined VSGSs, 24 (n = 962) VADs, and 9 (n = 245) EVDs. Pooled rates of outcome for VSGS, VAD, and EVD, respectively, were 9.6%, 7.3%, and 6.8% for obstruction; 9.2%, 9.5%, and 6.7% for infection; 12.2%, 10.8%, and 47.3% for revision; 13.9%, 17.5%, and 31.8% for arrest of hydrocephalus; 12.1%, 15.3%, and 19.1% for death; and 58.7%, 50.1%, and 56.1% for good neurodevelopmental outcome. CONCLUSIONS This study provides robust estimates of outcomes for the most common temporizing treatments for IVH in premature infants. With few exceptions, the range of outcomes was similar for VSGS, VAD, and EVD.
目的 早产儿脑室内出血(IVH)及出血后脑室扩张(PHVD)/出血后脑积水(PHH)的最佳临床管理仍不明确。一种常见的方法是在这些患者中采用脑室 - 帽状腱膜下分流术(VSGS)、脑室引流装置(VAD)或外部脑室引流(EVD)对脑积水进行临时治疗,直到明确患者需要且能够耐受永久性脑脊液分流(即脑室 - 腹腔分流术)。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在对已发表的关于这三种技术作为与早产相关的PHVD/PHH管理中的临时措施的临床结局和并发症的文献进行全面而有力的总结。方法 作者检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、谷歌学术和Cochrane图书馆,以查找截至2013年12月发表的关于使用VSGS、VAD和/或EVD作为早产新生儿IVH后脑积水治疗临时装置的研究。从符合条件的文章中提取与患者人口统计学数据、研究方法、干预措施和结局相关的数据。对于这三种临时装置中的每一种,作者进行荟萃分析,考察6个感兴趣的结局,即1)阻塞率;2)感染率;3)脑积水停止(即永久分流独立)率;4)死亡率;5)良好神经发育结局率;6)翻修率。结果 39项研究,共1502例患者,符合纳入标准。所有纳入文章均为观察性研究;36项为回顾性研究,3项为前瞻性研究。9项研究(n = 295)考察VSGS,24项(n = 962)考察VAD,9项(n = 245)考察EVD。VSGS、VAD和EVD的合并结局率分别为:阻塞率9.6%、7.3%和6.8%;感染率9.2%、9.5%和6.7%;翻修率12.2%、10.8%和47.3%;脑积水停止率13.9%、17.5%和31.8%;死亡率12.1%、17.5%和31.8%;良好神经发育结局率58.7%、50.1%和56.1%。结论 本研究为早产儿IVH最常见的临时治疗结局提供了可靠的估计。除少数例外,VSGS、VAD和EVD的结局范围相似。