Ngiam Kee Yuan, Khoo Valerie Yu Hui, Kong Lucy, Cheng Anton Kui Sing
Division of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 8, 119228, Singapore City, Singapore.
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, 117597, Singapore City, Singapore.
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):1069-74. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1852-y.
Bariatric surgery is increasingly being carried out and revisional procedures have also risen in concert. A review of the complications and revisions might elucidate technical and patient factors that influence the outcomes of bariatric surgeries in Asian patients. The objective of this study is to review the safety and efficacy of revisional bariatric surgery in a single center in Singapore over a 10-year period.
The setting of this study is a single public hospital with a multidisciplinary bariatric service including a weight management center, specialized endocrinology services, and bariatric surgical team. Participants were selected for surgery based on body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities. All patients underwent primary laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Patients were then analyzed according to the types of revisional surgeries. The primary outcome was the type of complications and revisional surgeries. Secondary outcomes include short-term excess weight loss and further complications.
A total of 365 patients were analyzed. 9.6% had a secondary procedure. In particular, two groups of complications required revisional surgery: failure of sustained weight loss and complications related to the LAGB insertion and use. Revisional surgeries had equivalent major complication rates (5.7%) compared to primary bariatric surgeries (6.8%). Revisional surgeries such as revisional LAGB (4.9 ± 9.8 kg), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG; 6.9 ± 21.0 kg), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; 4.6 ± 13.0 kg), and bilio-pancreatic diversion (BPD; 3.5 ± 6.3 kg) had modest weight loss compared to primary weight loss (12.7 ± 9.5 kg). Primary LAGB had a greater percentage excess weight loss in the first and second years post-surgery compared to revisional surgeries. There was one mortality post-primary surgery and no post-revisional surgical mortalities.
Revisional bariatric surgery for complications related to the primary surgery is safe but had reduced excess weight loss compared to the initial surgery.
减肥手术的开展日益增多,翻修手术也随之同步增加。对并发症和翻修情况进行回顾,可能会阐明影响亚洲患者减肥手术效果的技术和患者因素。本研究的目的是回顾新加坡一家单一中心在10年期间翻修减肥手术的安全性和有效性。
本研究的开展地点是一家单一的公立医院,其提供包括体重管理中心、专业内分泌服务和减肥手术团队在内的多学科减肥服务。根据体重指数(BMI)和合并症选择手术参与者。所有患者均接受了初次腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)。然后根据翻修手术的类型对患者进行分析。主要结局是并发症和翻修手术的类型。次要结局包括短期超重减轻和进一步的并发症。
共分析了365例患者。9.6%的患者接受了二次手术。具体而言,有两组并发症需要进行翻修手术:持续减肥失败以及与LAGB植入和使用相关的并发症。与初次减肥手术(6.8%)相比,翻修手术的主要并发症发生率相当(5.7%)。与初次体重减轻(12.7±9.5千克)相比,翻修LAGB(4.9±9.8千克)、腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG;6.9±21.0千克)、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB;4.6±13.0千克)和胆胰转流术(BPD;3.5±6.3千克)等翻修手术的体重减轻幅度较小。与翻修手术相比,初次LAGB在术后第一年和第二年的超重减轻百分比更高。初次手术后有1例死亡,翻修手术后无死亡病例。
针对初次手术相关并发症进行的翻修减肥手术是安全的,但与初次手术相比,超重减轻有所减少。