• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术中近端与远端脑保护方法的围手术期及长期结果比较。

Comparison of periprocedural and long term outcomes of proximal versus distal cerebral protection method during carotid artery stenting.

作者信息

Bastug Gul Zeynep, Akkaya Emre, Vuruskan Ertan, Akgul Ozgur, Pusuroglu Hamdi, Surgit Ozgur, Ozbay Ozyilmaz Sinem, Rodi Tosu Aydin, Altug Cakmak Huseyin, Gode Safa, Gul Mehmet

机构信息

1 Department of Neurology, Dr. Mazhar Osman Teaching and Research Hospital for Mental Health and Neurological Disorders, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Vasa. 2015 Jul;44(4):297-304. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000445.

DOI:10.1024/0301-1526/a000445
PMID:26314362
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the periprocedural and one-year outcomes of two different cerebral protection systems used during carotid artery stenting (CAS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 90 consecutive patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CAS with a proximal flow blockage protection system (mean age 69.7 ± 8) or distal protection with a filter (mean age 70.8 ± 7).

RESULTS

CAS was performed successively on 89 patients (99 %). Adverse events were defined as major stroke, minor stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, and death. Two strokes, one TIA, one death, and one myocardial infarction were observed in-hospital. There were no significant differences in safety or benefits between the proximal flow blockage embolic protection system (n = 45) and the distal filter protection system (n = 45) in terms of clinically apparent cerebral embolism, TIA, death, or myocardial infarction during the periprocedural stage or during the one-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it has been shown that the proximal flow blockage cerebral protection system decreases the risk of silent cerebral embolism, it has no advantage over the distal filter protection system in terms of adverse cerebrovascular or cardiac events during the periprocedural stage or during the long-term follow-up period.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)期间使用的两种不同脑保护系统的围手术期及一年期结局。

患者与方法

我们连续纳入90例患有颈动脉狭窄的患者,这些患者接受了采用近端血流阻断保护系统的CAS(平均年龄69.7±8岁)或采用滤网的远端保护(平均年龄70.8±7岁)。

结果

89例患者(99%)成功进行了CAS。不良事件定义为重大卒中、轻度卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、心肌梗死和死亡。住院期间观察到2例卒中、1例TIA、1例死亡和1例心肌梗死。在围手术期或一年随访期内,就临床明显的脑栓塞、TIA、死亡或心肌梗死而言,近端血流阻断栓塞保护系统(n = 45)和远端滤网保护系统(n = 45)在安全性或获益方面无显著差异。

结论

尽管已表明近端血流阻断脑保护系统可降低无症状脑栓塞的风险,但在围手术期或长期随访期内,就不良脑血管或心脏事件而言,其并不优于远端滤网保护系统。

相似文献

1
Comparison of periprocedural and long term outcomes of proximal versus distal cerebral protection method during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中近端与远端脑保护方法的围手术期及长期结果比较。
Vasa. 2015 Jul;44(4):297-304. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000445.
2
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
3
A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-based study of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal versus transfemoral filter protection.基于扩散加权磁共振成像的经颈内颈动脉支架置入术与经股动脉滤器保护的血流逆转研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.107. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
4
Flow reversal versus filter protection: a pilot carotid artery stenting randomized trial.血流逆转与滤器保护:一项颈动脉支架置入术的初步随机试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;6(5):552-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000479.
5
Proximal versus distal protection during carotid artery stenting: analysis of the two treatment approaches and associated clinical outcomes.颈动脉支架置入术中近端与远端保护的对比:两种治疗方法的分析及相关临床结局。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Mar-Apr;81(3-4):543-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
6
Design of the rosuvastatin pretreatment to reduce embolization during Carotid Artery Stenting trial.瑞舒伐他汀预处理以减少颈动脉支架置入术中栓塞的试验设计。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014 Jul;15(7):595-600. doi: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000446384.42103.a3.
7
Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting.脑保护装置对颈动脉支架置入术早期预后的影响。
J Endovasc Ther. 2002 Dec;9(6):786-92. doi: 10.1177/152660280200900611.
8
The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial.PROFI 研究(颈动脉支架置入术中近端球囊闭塞与滤器保护预防脑栓塞的前瞻性随机试验)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.035. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
9
Carotid Artery Stenting With Proximal Embolic Protection via a Transradial or Transbrachial Approach: Pushing the Boundaries of the Technique While Maintaining Safety and Efficacy.经桡动脉或肱动脉途径行近端栓子保护的颈动脉支架置入术:在保持安全性和有效性的同时拓展技术边界
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Aug;23(4):549-60. doi: 10.1177/1526602816651424. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
10
The role of transfemoral carotid artery stenting with proximal balloon occlusion embolic protection in the contemporary endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术联合近端球囊阻断栓塞保护在当代颈动脉狭窄血管内治疗中的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1701-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Apr 3.