• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早产儿低流量吸氧与经鼻持续气道正压通气的随机试验

A Randomized Trial of Low-Flow Oxygen versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants.

作者信息

Heiring Christian, Steensberg Jesper, Bjerager Mia, Greisen Gorm

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Neonatology. 2015;108(4):259-65. doi: 10.1159/000437203. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1159/000437203
PMID:26314696
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) stabilizes the residual volume and may decrease the risk of 'atelectotrauma', potentially promoting lung development in neonates.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether replacing nCPAP by low-flow O2 by nasal cannula affects lung function expressed as the arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratio (a/A pO2 ratio) on postnatal day 28.

METHODS

Preterm infants (birth weight <1,500 g and gestational age, GA >26 + 0 weeks) stable on nCPAP between postnatal days 4 and 7 were randomized to nCPAP or low-flow O2 by nasal cannula (<0.2 liters/min). Study criteria defined how to wean/restart respiratory support or change from low-flow O2 to nCPAP and vice versa. Transcutaneous monitoring was used for the assessment of the a/A pO2 ratio on day 28 using a head box for all infants for accurate measurement and to eliminate possible effects from nCPAP or low-flow O2 on oxygen requirement.

RESULTS

We enrolled 52 infants (nCPAP group n = 30 and low-flow O2 group n = 22). The a/A pO2 ratio at 28 days was 0.43 ± 0.17 (nCPAP group) versus 0.48 ± 0.18 (p = 0.36). The duration of nCPAP was 16.4 (low-flow group) versus 41.1 days (nCPAP group), p < 0.001. There was no difference between groups in the fraction needing any respiratory support at 36 weeks' corrected age, length of stay, weight at discharge, and relative weight gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacing nCPAP by low-flow O2 in preterm infants with GA >26 weeks at the end of the first week of life did not seem to affect the a/A pO2 ratio or weight gain negatively. Thus, prolonged nCPAP seems not to have a positive effect on lung function at 28 days of life and replacement by low-flow O2 could reduce the cost of equipment and increase the ease of nursing.

摘要

背景

经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)可稳定残气量,并可能降低“肺不张性创伤”的风险,从而有可能促进新生儿的肺发育。

目的

评估在出生后第28天,用鼻导管低流量吸氧替代nCPAP是否会影响以动脉/肺泡氧分压比(a/A pO2比)表示的肺功能。

方法

出生体重<1500克且胎龄(GA)>26 + 0周、在出生后第4至7天使用nCPAP稳定的早产儿被随机分为nCPAP组或鼻导管低流量吸氧组(<0.2升/分钟)。研究标准定义了如何撤机/重启呼吸支持,或从低流量吸氧改为nCPAP,反之亦然。在出生后第28天,对所有婴儿使用头箱进行经皮监测以评估a/A pO2比,以进行准确测量并消除nCPAP或低流量吸氧对氧需求的可能影响。

结果

我们纳入了52名婴儿(nCPAP组n = 30,低流量吸氧组n = 22)。出生后第28天的a/A pO2比,nCPAP组为0.43±0.17,低流量吸氧组为0.48±0.18(p = 0.36)。nCPAP的使用时长,低流量吸氧组为16.4天,nCPAP组为41.1天,p < 0.001。在矫正年龄36周时需要任何呼吸支持的比例、住院时长、出院体重和相对体重增加方面,两组之间没有差异。

结论

在出生后第一周结束时,对于GA>26周的早产儿,用低流量吸氧替代nCPAP似乎不会对a/A pO2比或体重增加产生负面影响。因此,延长nCPAP使用时间似乎对出生后第28天的肺功能没有积极影响,用低流量吸氧替代可降低设备成本并增加护理便利性。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Trial of Low-Flow Oxygen versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants.早产儿低流量吸氧与经鼻持续气道正压通气的随机试验
Neonatology. 2015;108(4):259-65. doi: 10.1159/000437203. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
2
High flow nasal cannula versus NCPAP, duration to full oral feeds in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.高流量鼻导管与鼻塞式持续气道正压通气用于早产儿完全经口喂养的时长:一项随机对照试验
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jul;102(4):F329-F332. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311388. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Sudden vs Pressure Wean From Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Infants Born Before 32 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.早产儿(胎龄<32 周)应用经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗过程中突发撤机与压力递减撤机的随机临床试验
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Sep 1;172(9):824-831. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2074.
4
[Efficacy and safety of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for prevention of extubation failure in neonates].[加温湿化高流量鼻导管预防新生儿拔管失败的有效性和安全性]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;52(4):271-6.
5
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高流量鼻导管与经鼻持续气道正压通气用于呼吸窘迫早产儿的初始呼吸支持:一项随机对照试验
Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
6
Sudden versus gradual pressure wean from Nasal CPAP in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.早产儿经鼻持续气道正压通气(Nasal CPAP)压力的突然降低与逐渐降低:一项随机对照试验
J Perinatol. 2017 Jun;37(6):662-667. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.10. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
7
Randomised controlled trial of weaning strategies for preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure.经鼻持续气道正压通气的早产儿撤机策略随机对照试验
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Oct 7;15:147. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0462-0.
8
A randomized controlled trial of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels after extubation in preterm infants.经鼻持续气道正压通气两种水平用于拔管后早产儿的随机对照试验
J Pediatr. 2014 Jan;164(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Discontinuing Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Infants ≤32 Weeks of Gestational Age: A Randomized Control Trial.≤32 周龄婴儿停止使用经鼻持续气道正压通气:一项随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 2021 Mar;230:93-99.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.045. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
10
Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants.护士对极早产儿高流量鼻导管治疗的看法。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Oct;50(10):806-10. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12636. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for apnoea of prematurity.持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗早产儿呼吸暂停。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 18;7(7):CD013660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013660.pub2.
2
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants.持续气道正压通气(CPAP)用于治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):CD002271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002271.pub3.