Amatya S, Macomber M, Bhutada A, Rastogi D, Rastogi S
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Maimonides Medical Center, Children and Infants Hospital of Brooklyn, Brooklyn NY, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
J Perinatol. 2017 Jun;37(6):662-667. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.10. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
In preterm infants, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is widely used for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. However, the strategies for successfully weaning infants off NCPAP are still not well defined and there remains considerable variation between the methods. The objective of this study is to determine whether gradual weaning of NCPAP pressure is more successful than sudden weaning off NCPAP to room air.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit on 70 preterm neonates who were born between 26 and 32 weeks gestation and required NCPAP for at least 48 h. When infants were stable on NCPAP at 0.21 FiO and 5 cm HO positive end expiratory pressure, neonates were randomized to the gradual wean group (reduction in pressure by 1 cm every 8 h until 3 cm H0 was reached) or to sudden wean group (one time NCPAP removal to room air). The primary outcome was a success at the first trial to wean to room air. Secondary outcomes were a number of trials, and weight and postmenstrual age (PMA) at the time of successful wean. Total number of days on NCPAP and length of stay (LOS) in the hospital were also compared between the groups.
Of the 70 infants included in the study, 35 were randomized to sudden group and 33 infants to gradual group (2 excluded for protocol deviation). In sudden and gradual groups, 14 and 22 infants, respectively, were weaned successfully in the first attempt (P=0.03). The infants were successfully weaned at 32.7±1.7 weeks versus 33.1±2.4 weeks (P=0.39) PMA and at a weight of 1651±290 g versus 1589±398 g (P=0.46) in the sudden and gradual groups, respectively. The total number of days on NCPAP was 27±19 days versus 32±24 days (P=0.38) and LOS was 63±25 days versus 63±22 days (P=0.99) in the sudden and gradual groups, respectively.
Gradual weaning method was more successful as compared to sudden weaning method in the initial trial off NCPAP. There was no difference in the PMA, weight at the time of successful wean, total days on NCPAP and LOS between the two groups.
在早产儿中,鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)被广泛用于治疗呼吸窘迫综合征。然而,成功使婴儿撤机脱离NCPAP的策略仍未明确界定,且方法之间存在相当大的差异。本研究的目的是确定NCPAP压力逐渐降低撤机是否比突然撤机至室内空气更成功。
在一家三级新生儿重症监护病房对70名孕26至32周出生且需要NCPAP至少48小时的早产儿进行了一项随机对照试验。当婴儿在吸入氧分数(FiO)0.21和呼气末正压5cmH₂O的NCPAP支持下情况稳定时,将新生儿随机分为逐渐撤机组(每8小时压力降低1cmH₂O直至达到3cmH₂O)或突然撤机组(一次性将NCPAP撤至室内空气)。主要结局是首次尝试撤机至室内空气成功。次要结局是尝试次数、成功撤机时的体重和胎龄(PMA)。还比较了两组NCPAP使用的总天数和住院时间(LOS)。
纳入研究的70名婴儿中,35名被随机分配至突然撤机组,33名被分配至逐渐撤机组(2名因方案偏离被排除)。在突然撤机组和逐渐撤机组中,分别有14名和22名婴儿首次尝试撤机成功(P=0.03)。突然撤机组和逐渐撤机组婴儿成功撤机时的胎龄分别为32.7±1.7周和33.1±2.4周(P=0.39),体重分别为1651±290g和1589±398g(P=0.46)。突然撤机组和逐渐撤机组NCPAP使用的总天数分别为27±19天和32±24天(P=0.38),住院时间分别为63±25天和63±22天(P=0.99)。
在首次尝试脱离NCPAP时,逐渐撤机方法比突然撤机方法更成功。两组在成功撤机时的胎龄、体重、NCPAP使用总天数和住院时间方面没有差异。