Fortune Dónal G, Rogan Carol R, Richards Helen L
Centre for Social Issues, Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Ireland.
Acquired Brain Injury Ireland, Dun Laoghaire, Co Dublin, Ireland.
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Feb;21(1):224-43. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12159. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether a brief structured multicomponent group programme for carers of people with acquired brain injury (ABI) was effective in reducing carer distress, strain, and critical comments between carer and person with an ABI compared to a waiting list control condition.
Waiting list controlled study. Pre- and post-test design with outcomes measured at induction, at the end of the intervention, and at the 3-month follow-up.
One hundred and thirteen carers took part in the study: 75 carers in the intervention group and 38 in the waiting list control group (2:1 ratio). All participants completed assessments of caregiver strain (Caregiver Strain Index), perceived criticism towards and from the person with an ABI (Perceived Criticism Scale), and psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The person with an ABI was also assessed on the Functional Independence Measure/Functional Assessment Measure.
Using an intention to treat analysis, there were significant effects of group (intervention vs. waiting list control) at the 3-month follow-up on carers' perceptions of stress and strain resulting from caring, and perceptions of criticism received by the carer from the person with an ABI. A subsequent per-protocol analysis showed an additional reduction at 3 months in levels of criticism expressed towards the person with an ABI by the carer. There was no significant effect of the intervention on psychological distress.
The structured multicomponent carers programme showed beneficial effects in terms of reducing carer strain and in the reduction of elements of perceived criticism at the 3-month follow-up; however, it did not significantly affect psychological distress in carers, suggesting the need for additional support for this group of carers.
What is already known on this subject? A number of studies have suggested that carers of people with acquired brain injury (ABI) experience greater levels of carer burden and mental health difficulties than carers of other patient groups. Previous interventional studies on ABI are few, and such studies have diverged in the extent to which they have been oriented towards education, psychological support, or management of behavioural difficulties, making results somewhat difficult to apply in community health settings with this potential client group. What does this study add? We develop, describe, and evaluate a brief structured multicomponent carers' training and support programme for carers of people with ABI. Not all outcomes were affected positively by the intervention. While the intervention successfully reduced carer strain and critical comments, distress did not significantly reduce compared to people in a waiting list control group. Carers who were spouses/partners and carers who were parents exhibited comparable levels of strain, distress, and perceived criticism. Younger carers reported significantly higher levels of distress and carer strain at induction to the programme. The positive effects of the programme were maintained for at least 3 months, suggesting that it may have initial validity for improving some of the negative aspects of the carer experience.
本研究旨在探讨针对后天性脑损伤(ABI)患者照料者的简短结构化多成分团体项目,与等待名单对照条件相比,在减轻照料者的痛苦、压力以及照料者与ABI患者之间的批评性言论方面是否有效。
等待名单对照研究。采用前测和后测设计,在入组时、干预结束时以及3个月随访时测量结果。
113名照料者参与了本研究:干预组75名照料者,等待名单对照组38名照料者(比例为2:1)。所有参与者均完成了照料者压力评估(照料者压力指数)、对ABI患者的感知批评以及来自ABI患者的感知批评评估(感知批评量表),以及心理痛苦评估(医院焦虑抑郁量表)。ABI患者还接受了功能独立性测量/功能评估测量。
采用意向性分析,在3个月随访时,团体(干预组与等待名单对照组)对照料者因照料产生的压力和紧张感的认知,以及照料者从ABI患者那里收到的批评性认知有显著影响。随后的符合方案分析显示,在3个月时,照料者对ABI患者表达的批评水平进一步降低。干预对心理痛苦没有显著影响。
结构化多成分照料者项目在减轻照料者压力以及在3个月随访时减少感知批评方面显示出有益效果;然而,它对照料者的心理痛苦没有显著影响,这表明需要为这组照料者提供额外支持。
关于该主题已知的内容有哪些?一些研究表明,后天性脑损伤(ABI)患者的照料者比其他患者群体的照料者承受着更高水平的照料负担和心理健康问题。以前关于ABI的干预研究很少,而且这些研究在教育、心理支持或行为困难管理方面的侧重程度各不相同,使得结果在应用于这个潜在客户群体的社区卫生环境时有些困难。本研究增加了什么?我们开发、描述并评估了一个针对ABI患者照料者的简短结构化多成分培训和支持项目。并非所有结果都受到干预的积极影响。虽然干预成功减轻了照料者的压力和批评性言论,但与等待名单对照组的人相比,痛苦并没有显著减轻。配偶/伴侣照料者和父母照料者表现出相当的压力、痛苦和感知批评水平。较年轻的照料者在项目入组时报告的痛苦和照料者压力水平显著更高。该项目的积极效果至少维持了3个月,这表明它可能在改善照料者经历的一些负面方面具有初步有效性。