Ma Peng-Lin, Peng Xiao-Xia, Du Bin, Hu Xiao-Lan, Gong Yi-Chun, Wang Yu, Xi Xiu-Ming
Department of Critical Care Medicine, 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing 100091, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Sep 5;128(17):2374-82. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.163387.
This meta-analysis was to determine the association of the cumulative dose of 130/0.4 or 0.42 (hydroxyethyl starch [HES] 130/0.4*) or delta daily fluid balance (i.e., daily fluid balance in HES group over or below control group) with the heterogeneity of risk ratio (RR) for mortality in randomized control trials (RCTs).
Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane) were searched to identify prospective RCTs reporting mortality in adult patients with sepsis to compare HES130/0.4* with crystalloids or albumin. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were used to examine the heterogeneity sources of RR for mortality.
A total number of 4408 patients from 11 RCTs were included. The pooled RR showed no significant difference for overall mortality in patients with administration of HES130/0.4* compared with treatment of control fluids (RR: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.90-1.17; P = 0.73). Heterogeneity was moderate across recruited trials (I2 = 34%, P = 0.13). But, a significant variation was demonstrated in subgroup with crystalloids as control fluids (I2 = 42%, P < 0.1). Sensitivity analysis revealed that trials with high risk of bias did not significantly impact the pooled estimates for mortality. Meta-regression analysis also did not determine a dose-effect relationship of HES130/0.4* with mortality (P = 0.298), but suggested daily delta fluid balance being likely associated with mortality in septic patients receiving HES130/130/0.4* (P = 0.079).
Inappropriate daily positive fluid balance was likely an important source of heterogeneity in these trials reporting HES130/0.4* associated with excess mortality in septic patients.
本荟萃分析旨在确定130/0.4或0.42(羟乙基淀粉[HES] 130/0.4*)的累积剂量或每日液体平衡差值(即HES组相对于对照组的每日液体平衡)与随机对照试验(RCT)中死亡率风险比(RR)的异质性之间的关联。
检索三个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane),以识别报告脓毒症成年患者死亡率的前瞻性RCT,比较HES130/0.4*与晶体液或白蛋白。采用随机效应进行荟萃分析。使用敏感性和荟萃回归分析来检查死亡率RR的异质性来源。
纳入了来自11项RCT的总共4408例患者。与对照液体治疗相比,给予HES130/0.4的患者总体死亡率的合并RR无显著差异(RR:1.02,95%置信区间:0.90 - 1.17;P = 0.73)。在纳入的试验中异质性为中度(I² = 34%,P = 0.13)。但是,以晶体液作为对照液体的亚组中显示出显著差异(I² = 42%,P < 0.1)。敏感性分析表明,偏倚风险高的试验对死亡率的合并估计值没有显著影响。荟萃回归分析也未确定HES130/0.4与死亡率的剂量效应关系(P = 0.298),但提示每日液体平衡差值可能与接受HES130/0.4*的脓毒症患者的死亡率相关(P = 0.079)。
在这些报告HES130/0.4*与脓毒症患者死亡率过高相关的试验中,每日液体正平衡不当可能是异质性的一个重要来源。