Freyer Gilles, Kalinka-Warzocha Ewa, Syrigos Konstantinos, Marinca Mihai, Tonini Giuseppe, Ng Say Liang, Wong Zee Wan, Salar Antonio, Steger Guenther, Abdelsalam Mahmoud, DeCosta Lucy, Szabo Zsolt
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon Cancer Institute, Lyon University, Lyon, France,
Med Oncol. 2015 Oct;32(10):236. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0682-z. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially fatal complication of chemotherapy. This prospective, observational study describes physicians' approaches toward assessing FN risk in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with an intermediate (10-20 %) FN risk. In the baseline investigator assessment, physicians selected factors considered important when assessing overall FN risk and deciding on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (PP). Physicians then completed patient assessments using the same lists of factors. The final FN risk scores and whether G-CSF PP was planned were reported. The final analysis included 165 physicians and 944 patients. The most frequently considered factor in both assessments was chemotherapy agents in the backbone (88 % of investigator and 93 % of patient assessments). History of FN (83 %), baseline laboratory values (76 %) and age (73 %) were commonly selected at baseline, whereas tumor type (72 %), guidelines (62 %) and tumor stage (43 %) were selected most during patient assessments. Median investigator-reported FN risk threshold for G-CSF PP was 20 % (range 10-85 %). G-CSF PP was planned in 82 % of patients with an FN risk at or above this threshold; therefore, almost one-fifth of qualifying patients would not receive G-CSF PP. Physicians generally follow guidelines, but also consider individual patient characteristics when assessing FN risk and deciding on G-CSF PP. A standardized FN risk assessment may optimize the use of G-CSF PP, which may minimize the incidence of FN in patients undergoing chemotherapy with an intermediate FN risk. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01813721.
发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是化疗的一种潜在致命并发症。这项前瞻性观察性研究描述了医生在评估接受FN风险为中度(10%-20%)的化疗方案患者的FN风险时所采用的方法。在基线研究者评估中,医生选择了在评估总体FN风险和决定使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)一级预防(PP)时认为重要的因素。然后,医生使用相同的因素列表完成患者评估。报告了最终的FN风险评分以及是否计划进行G-CSF PP。最终分析纳入了165名医生和944名患者。在两次评估中最常被考虑的因素是主干化疗药物(研究者评估的88%和患者评估的93%)。基线时通常选择FN病史(83%)、基线实验室值(76%)和年龄(73%),而在患者评估期间最常选择肿瘤类型(72%)、指南(62%)和肿瘤分期(43%)。研究者报告的G-CSF PP的FN风险中位数阈值为20%(范围为10%-85%)。FN风险处于或高于该阈值的患者中有82%计划进行G-CSF PP;因此,近五分之一符合条件的患者将不会接受G-CSF PP。医生在评估FN风险和决定G-CSF PP时通常遵循指南,但也会考虑个体患者特征。标准化的FN风险评估可能会优化G-CSF PP的使用,这可能会使接受中度FN风险化疗的患者中FN的发生率降至最低。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01813721。