• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对于评估接受化疗且有中度发热性中性粒细胞减少风险的患者的风险以及使用粒细胞集落刺激因子作为一级预防措施的态度。

Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia.

作者信息

Freyer Gilles, Kalinka-Warzocha Ewa, Syrigos Konstantinos, Marinca Mihai, Tonini Giuseppe, Ng Say Liang, Wong Zee Wan, Salar Antonio, Steger Guenther, Abdelsalam Mahmoud, DeCosta Lucy, Szabo Zsolt

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon Cancer Institute, Lyon University, Lyon, France,

出版信息

Med Oncol. 2015 Oct;32(10):236. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0682-z. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1007/s12032-015-0682-z
PMID:26315712
Abstract

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially fatal complication of chemotherapy. This prospective, observational study describes physicians' approaches toward assessing FN risk in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with an intermediate (10-20 %) FN risk. In the baseline investigator assessment, physicians selected factors considered important when assessing overall FN risk and deciding on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (PP). Physicians then completed patient assessments using the same lists of factors. The final FN risk scores and whether G-CSF PP was planned were reported. The final analysis included 165 physicians and 944 patients. The most frequently considered factor in both assessments was chemotherapy agents in the backbone (88 % of investigator and 93 % of patient assessments). History of FN (83 %), baseline laboratory values (76 %) and age (73 %) were commonly selected at baseline, whereas tumor type (72 %), guidelines (62 %) and tumor stage (43 %) were selected most during patient assessments. Median investigator-reported FN risk threshold for G-CSF PP was 20 % (range 10-85 %). G-CSF PP was planned in 82 % of patients with an FN risk at or above this threshold; therefore, almost one-fifth of qualifying patients would not receive G-CSF PP. Physicians generally follow guidelines, but also consider individual patient characteristics when assessing FN risk and deciding on G-CSF PP. A standardized FN risk assessment may optimize the use of G-CSF PP, which may minimize the incidence of FN in patients undergoing chemotherapy with an intermediate FN risk. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01813721.

摘要

发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是化疗的一种潜在致命并发症。这项前瞻性观察性研究描述了医生在评估接受FN风险为中度(10%-20%)的化疗方案患者的FN风险时所采用的方法。在基线研究者评估中,医生选择了在评估总体FN风险和决定使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)一级预防(PP)时认为重要的因素。然后,医生使用相同的因素列表完成患者评估。报告了最终的FN风险评分以及是否计划进行G-CSF PP。最终分析纳入了165名医生和944名患者。在两次评估中最常被考虑的因素是主干化疗药物(研究者评估的88%和患者评估的93%)。基线时通常选择FN病史(83%)、基线实验室值(76%)和年龄(73%),而在患者评估期间最常选择肿瘤类型(72%)、指南(62%)和肿瘤分期(43%)。研究者报告的G-CSF PP的FN风险中位数阈值为20%(范围为10%-85%)。FN风险处于或高于该阈值的患者中有82%计划进行G-CSF PP;因此,近五分之一符合条件的患者将不会接受G-CSF PP。医生在评估FN风险和决定G-CSF PP时通常遵循指南,但也会考虑个体患者特征。标准化的FN风险评估可能会优化G-CSF PP的使用,这可能会使接受中度FN风险化疗的患者中FN的发生率降至最低。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01813721。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia.医生对于评估接受化疗且有中度发热性中性粒细胞减少风险的患者的风险以及使用粒细胞集落刺激因子作为一级预防措施的态度。
Med Oncol. 2015 Oct;32(10):236. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0682-z. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
2
The use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and management of chemotherapy delivery during adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer--further observations from the IMPACT solid study.粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的应用及早期乳腺癌辅助治疗期间化疗给药的管理——IMPACT实体瘤研究的进一步观察
Breast. 2016 Feb;25:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 20.
3
Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy--findings from clinical practice.中性粒细胞减少症的管理和粒细胞集落刺激因子在接受骨髓抑制化疗的实体瘤患者中的应用——来自临床实践的发现。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Mar;22(3):667-77. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
4
Use of colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis and incidence of febrile neutropenia from 2010 to 2016: a longitudinal assessment.2010 年至 2016 年集落刺激因子一级预防与中性粒细胞减少性发热发生率:纵向评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Jun;35(6):1073-1080. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1558851. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Assessing patients' risk of febrile neutropenia: is there a correlation between physician-assessed risk and model-predicted risk?评估患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的风险:医生评估的风险与模型预测的风险之间是否存在相关性?
Cancer Med. 2015 Aug;4(8):1153-60. doi: 10.1002/cam4.454. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
6
Cost-effectiveness of febrile neutropenia prevention with primary versus secondary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review.乳腺癌辅助化疗中,原发性与继发性粒细胞集落刺激因子预防发热性中性粒细胞减少的成本效益:一项系统评价
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;159(3):425-32. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3954-1. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
7
Time trends in utilization of G-CSF prophylaxis and risk of febrile neutropenia in a Medicare population receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.在接受辅助化疗治疗早期乳腺癌的 Medicare 人群中,G-CSF 预防用药的使用趋势与发热性中性粒细胞减少症风险的关系。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):539-548. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3863-9. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Adherence to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guidelines to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy--a representative sample survey in Germany.遵循粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)指南以降低化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症的发生率——德国的一项代表性抽样调查
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):367-376. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2779-5. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
9
Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy.一项针对因骨髓抑制性化疗而有发热性中性粒细胞减少风险的癌症患者的前瞻性剂量强度和中性粒细胞减少预防评估项目(DIEPP)的结果。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 Apr;128(7-8):238-47. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0917-1. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
The use of chemotherapy regimens carrying a moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the corresponding management of febrile neutropenia: an expert survey in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.化疗方案中中度或高度发热性中性粒细胞减少风险的应用及发热性中性粒细胞减少症的相应管理:乳腺癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤的专家调查。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Nov 23;10:642. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-642.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Baseline Risk Factors on the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy with Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis: A Real-World Data Analysis.基线风险因素对接受聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子预防性化疗的乳腺癌患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症发生率的影响:一项真实世界数据分析
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun 22;8(1):106-115. doi: 10.36469/001c.24564. eCollection 2021.
2
G-CSF guideline adherence in Germany, an update with a retrospective and representative sample survey.德国 G-CSF 指南依从性的更新:回顾性和代表性抽样调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Apr;27(4):1459-1469. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4481-x. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer: a systematic review.长效粒细胞集落刺激因子对癌症患者化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症的预防作用、疗效及安全性:一项系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Feb;23(2):525-45. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2457-z. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
2
Spectrum of hematological malignancies and peripheral cytopenias.血液系统恶性肿瘤和外周血细胞减少症的谱系
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2013 Sep;11(25):273-8.
3
Febrile neutropenia risk assessment tool: improving clinical outcomes for oncology patients.
Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.
门诊乳腺癌患者中粒细胞集落刺激因子的实际应用:一项横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):1099-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4399-3. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
发热性中性粒细胞减少症风险评估工具:改善肿瘤患者的临床结局。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Apr;18(2):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
4
Improving the relative dose intensity of systemic chemotherapy in a community-based outpatient cancer center.提高社区癌症门诊化疗的相对剂量强度。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Sep;9(5):e203-11. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000810. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
5
The impact of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on chemotherapy dose intensity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.粒细胞集落刺激因子对化疗剂量强度和癌症生存的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24(10):2475-2484. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt226. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
6
Primary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant TC or FEC-D chemotherapy outside of clinical trial settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.辅助 TC 或 FEC-D 化疗方案在临床试验以外的环境中应用初级 G-CSF 预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Oct;20(10):2523-30. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1375-6. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
7
Epidemiology, management and economic impact of febrile neutropenia in oncology patients receiving routine care at a regional UK cancer centre.在英国一家地区癌症中心,接受常规护理的肿瘤患者中性粒细胞减少性发热的流行病学、管理和经济影响。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jul;23(7):1889-93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr520. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
8
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症预防用粒细胞集落刺激因子:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Sep 23;11:404. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-404.
9
Real-world experience with adjuvant fec-d chemotherapy in four Ontario regional cancer centres.在安大略省四个地区癌症中心应用辅助 FEC-D 化疗的真实世界经验。
Curr Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(3):119-25. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i3.751.
10
Reporting of myelotoxicity associated with emerging regimens for the treatment of selected solid tumors.新兴方案治疗特定实体瘤相关骨髓毒性的报告。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012 Feb;81(2):136-50. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 19.