Mądry Radosław, Popławska Lidia, Haslbauer Ferdinand, Šafanda Martin, Ghizdavescu Doru, Benkovicova Jana, Csőszi Tibor, Mihaylov Georgi, Niepel Daniela, Jaeger Christine, Frkanova Iveta, Macovei Alina, Staudigl Christine
Clinic of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Szamarzewskiego 82/84, 60-569, Poznan, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 Apr;128(7-8):238-47. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0917-1. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
To describe the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and use of pegfilgrastim in cancer patients with high overall risk of FN and to investigate the relationship between granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guideline adherence and chemotherapy delivery in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and Austria.
Dose Intensity Evaluation Program and Prophylaxis (DIEPP) was a multicentre, prospective, and observational study of adult patients with breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer, who received chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support and who had an overall risk of FN ≥ 20 %. Physicians assessed patient risk factors and reported their reasons for administering pegfilgrastim.
Patients were enrolled from 113 centres in CEE and Austria between August 2010 and July 2013, and data were analysed from 1072 patients. The most common tumour types were breast cancer (50 %) and lymphoma (24 %). FN incidence was 5 % overall. FN occurred in 3 % of patients (28/875) who received pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis (PP) and 13 % of patients (19/142) who received it as secondary prophylaxis (SP); 79 % of FN events in SP patients occurred in the first cycle before pegfilgrastim was administered. The three most frequently chosen reasons for using pegfilgrastim were planned chemotherapy with high FN risk, female gender, and advanced disease. Overall, 40 % of patients received > 90 % of their planned chemotherapy dose within 3 days of the planned schedule.
FN incidence was relatively low with pegfilgrastim PP in patients with a physician-assessed overall FN risk of ≥ 20 %. The most important reasons for pegfilgrastim use were consistent with the investigators' risk assessment and international guidelines.
描述发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的发生率以及聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子(pegfilgrastim)在FN总体风险较高的癌症患者中的使用情况,并调查中东欧(CEE)和奥地利粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)指南依从性与化疗实施之间的关系。
剂量强度评估计划与预防(DIEPP)是一项针对成年乳腺癌、淋巴瘤、肺癌、胃癌和卵巢癌患者的多中心、前瞻性观察性研究,这些患者接受了pegfilgrastim支持的化疗,且FN总体风险≥20%。医生评估患者风险因素并报告使用pegfilgrastim的原因。
2010年8月至2013年7月期间,从CEE和奥地利的113个中心招募了患者,并对1072例患者的数据进行了分析。最常见的肿瘤类型是乳腺癌(50%)和淋巴瘤(24%)。总体FN发生率为5%。接受pegfilgrastim作为一级预防(PP)的患者中有3%(28/875)发生FN,接受pegfilgrastim作为二级预防(SP)的患者中有13%(19/142)发生FN;SP患者中79%的FN事件发生在首次使用pegfilgrastim之前的第一个周期。使用pegfilgrastim最常选择的三个原因是计划进行的FN风险高的化疗、女性性别和疾病晚期。总体而言,40%的患者在计划疗程的3天内接受了>90%的计划化疗剂量。
在医生评估FN总体风险≥20%的患者中,使用pegfilgrastim进行PP时FN发生率相对较低。使用pegfilgrastim的最重要原因与研究者的风险评估和国际指南一致。