Estrada José M, Kraakman N J R, Lebrero R, Muñoz R
Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, University of Valladolid, Dr. Mergelina, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.
Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands; CH2M, Level 7, 9 Help Street, Chatswood, NSW 2067, Australia.
Bioresour Technol. 2015 Nov;196:685-93. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.044. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Traditional physical/chemical end-of-the-pipe technologies for odor abatement are relatively expensive and present high environmental impacts. On the other hand, biotechnologies have recently emerged as cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternatives but are still limited by their investment costs and land requirements. A more desirable approach to odor control is the prevention of odorant formation before being released to the atmosphere, but limited information is available beyond good design and operational practices of the wastewater treatment process. The present paper reviews two widely applicable and economic alternatives for odor control, Activated Sludge Recycling (ASR) and Oxidized Ammonium Recycling (OAR), by discussing their fundamentals, key operating parameters and experience from the available pilot and field studies. Both technologies present high application potential using readily available plant by-products with a minimum plant upgrading, and low investment and operating costs, contributing to the sustainability and economic efficiency of odor control at wastewater treatment facilities.
传统的用于除臭的物理/化学终端处理技术相对昂贵,且对环境影响较大。另一方面,生物技术最近已成为具有成本效益且环保的替代方案,但仍受投资成本和土地需求的限制。一种更理想的气味控制方法是在气味排放到大气之前防止其形成,但除了污水处理过程的良好设计和操作实践外,相关信息有限。本文通过讨论活性污泥循环(ASR)和氧化铵循环(OAR)这两种广泛适用且经济的气味控制替代方案的基本原理、关键操作参数以及现有中试和现场研究的经验,对其进行了综述。这两种技术利用现成的工厂副产品,只需对工厂进行最小程度的升级,具有很高的应用潜力,且投资和运营成本低,有助于提高污水处理设施气味控制的可持续性和经济效益。