Suppr超能文献

莱邦博铁木的树木组成部分生物量扩展因子及根冠比:测量不确定度

Tree component biomass expansion factors and root-to-shoot ratio of Lebombo ironwood: measurement uncertainty.

作者信息

Magalhães Tarquinio Mateus, Seifert Thomas

机构信息

Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Campus Universitário Principal, Edifício no 1, Maputo, Mozambique ; Department of Forest and Wood Science, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1 Matieland, 7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Department of Forest and Wood Science, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1 Matieland, 7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa.

出版信息

Carbon Balance Manag. 2015 Apr 12;10:9. doi: 10.1186/s13021-015-0019-4. eCollection 2015 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

National and regional aboveground biomass (AGB) estimates are generally computed based on standing stem volume estimates from forest inventories and default biomass expansion factors (BEFs). AGB estimates are converted to estimates of belowground biomass (BGB) using default root-to-shoot ratios (R/S). Thus, BEFs and R/S are not estimated in ordinary forest inventories, which results in uncertainty in estimates of AGB and BGB. Here, we measured BEF and R/S values (including uncertainty) for different components of Lebombo ironwood ( Prain) trees and assessed their dependence on tree size.

RESULTS

The BEF values of tree components were unrelated or weakly related to tree size, and R/S was independent of tree size. BEF values varied from 0.02 for foliage to 1.31 Mg m for whole tree; measurement uncertainty (SE) varied from 2.9% for stem BEF to 10.6% for whole-tree BEF. The belowground, aboveground, and whole-tree BEF-based biomass densities were 30 ± 2.3 (SE = 3.89%), 121 ± 7.84 (SE = 3.23%), and 151 ± 9.87 Mg ha(SE = 3.27%), respectively. R/S was 0.24 with an uncertainty of 3.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the finding of independence or weak dependence of BEF on tree size, we concluded that, for , constant component BEF values can be accurately used within the interval of harvested tree sizes.

摘要

背景

国家和区域地上生物量(AGB)估计通常基于森林资源清查中的立木蓄积量估计和默认的生物量扩展因子(BEF)来计算。AGB估计值使用默认的根冠比(R/S)转换为地下生物量(BGB)估计值。因此,普通森林资源清查中并未估计BEF和R/S,这导致AGB和BGB估计存在不确定性。在此,我们测量了勒邦博铁木(Prain)树不同组成部分的BEF和R/S值(包括不确定性),并评估了它们对树木大小的依赖性。

结果

树木各组成部分的BEF值与树木大小无关或相关性较弱,且R/S与树木大小无关。BEF值从树叶的0.02到整棵树的1.31 Mg/m不等;测量不确定性(SE)从树干BEF的2.9%到整棵树BEF的10.6%不等。基于BEF的地下、地上和整棵树的生物量密度分别为30±2.3(SE = 3.89%)、121±7.84(SE = 3.23%)和151±9.87 Mg/ha(SE = 3.27%)。R/S为0.24,不确定性为3.4%。

结论

基于BEF对树木大小独立性或弱依赖性的发现,我们得出结论,对于[具体情况未提及],在采伐树木大小的区间内可以准确使用恒定的组成部分BEF值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/876e/5256513/01d51342ad49/13021_2015_19_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验