Suppr超能文献

[克氏针贯穿固定不稳定型踝关节骨折:适应症、手术技术及疗效]

[Kirschner wire transfixation of unstable ankle fractures: indication, surgical technique and outcomes].

作者信息

Marvan J, Džupa V, Bartoška R, Kachlík D, Krbec M, Báča V

机构信息

Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika FNKV a 3. LF UK Praha.

出版信息

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(3):216-21.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of the study was to assess treatment outcomes in patients undergoing K-wire transfixation of unstable ankle fractures and compare the results with those of patients in whom it was possible to perform primary one-stage osteosynthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2009 and 2012, a total of 358 patients (191 women and 167 men) had surgery for unstable ankle fracture. At 1-year follow-up, their subjective feelings, objective findings and ankle radiographs were evaluated. The fractures were categorised according to the Weber classification. A patient group treated by one-stage osteosynthesis, a group with definitive transfixation and a group of patients in whom temporary transfixation was converted to definitive osteosynthesis were assessed and compared. RESULTS The group treated by one-stage osteosynthesis included 278 patients with an average age of 47 years; the group of 20 patients with definitive transfixation had an average age of 67 years, and the group of 60 patients who had temporary transfixation with subsequent conversion to internal osteosynthesis were 55 years on average. In the group with one-stage osteosynthesis, 223 (80%) ankle fractures on post-injury radiographs were associated with minor joint dislocations and 55 (20%) with major dislocations. On the other hand, the radiographs of the patients treated by temporary transfixation and delayed open reduction with internal fixation showed major dislocations in 38 (63%) and minor dislocations in the rest of the patients (37%); the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). Posterior malleolar fractures were most frequent in the group with temporary transfixation (60%) and least frequent in the group with primary osteosynthesis (44%); also this difference was statistically significant (p=0.032). At one-year follow-up, in the group with one-stage osteosynthesis, 220 patients (79%) had no radiographic signs of posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis while, in the group with temporary transfixation, no radiographic evidence of ankle osteoarthritis was recorded in 25 (42%) patients. While tibiofibular synostosis was recorded in only few patients (9%) of the group with one-stage osteosynthesis, it showed a high occurrence in the group with temporary transfixation (35%). The patients with one-stage osteosynthesis (188/68%) had a higher proportion of excellent outcomes measured on the Olerund-Molander ankle scoring scale than the other two groups (temporary transfixation, 47%; definitive transfixation,10%); in both cases the difference was significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). DISCUSSION In this study the morphological and clinical aspects of surgically treated ankle fractures were assessed. The patients with one-stage osteosynthesis were compared with those treated by temporary or definitive transfixation. The majority of patients undergoing temporary transfixation had a fractured posterior margin of the tibia and major ankle joint dislocation, which suggested serious injuries to bone and ligament structures. Generally, the use of only two K-wires inserted through the calcaneus and talus into the distal tibia is recommended. Patients with K-wire transfixation usually require a longer hospital stay because of the serious nature of their injuries. CONCLUSIONS The therapy of choice for unstable ankle fractures is one-stage osteosynthesis. Temporary transfixation is an effective method of primary management when an unstable fracture cannot be treated by definitive osteosynthesis at the early stage due to local or general health conditions of the patient. The temporary transfixation provides good alignment of the ankle joint necessary for successful healing of soft tissues. A higher occurrence of post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis, ossification and distal tibiotalar synostosis found in the patients treated by temporary transfixation is more related to serious types of ankle fractures the patient had suffered than to the method itself. Key words: unstable ankle fracture, soft tissue condition, indications for transfixation, treatment outcome.

摘要

研究目的 本研究旨在评估采用克氏针固定不稳定踝关节骨折患者的治疗效果,并将结果与能够进行一期初次骨合成的患者进行比较。

材料与方法 2009年至2012年间,共有358例患者(191例女性和167例男性)接受了不稳定踝关节骨折手术。在1年随访时,评估了他们的主观感受、客观检查结果及踝关节X线片。骨折根据Weber分类法进行分类。对一期骨合成治疗组、确定性固定组和临时固定转为确定性骨合成的患者组进行了评估和比较。

结果 一期骨合成治疗组包括278例患者,平均年龄47岁;20例确定性固定患者组平均年龄67岁,60例临时固定随后转为内固定的患者组平均年龄55岁。在一期骨合成组中,伤后X线片显示223例(80%)踝关节骨折伴有轻度关节脱位,55例(20%)伴有重度脱位。另一方面,临时固定并延迟切开复位内固定治疗的患者X线片显示,38例(63%)为重度脱位,其余患者(37%)为轻度脱位;两组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。后踝骨折在临时固定组最常见(60%),在一期骨合成组最少见(44%);此差异也有统计学意义(p=0.032)。在1年随访时,一期骨合成组中220例(79%)患者无创伤后踝关节骨关节炎的X线征象,而在临时固定组中,25例(42%)患者未记录到踝关节骨关节炎的X线证据。一期骨合成组仅有少数患者(9%)出现胫腓骨融合,而在临时固定组发生率较高(35%)。在Olerund-Molander踝关节评分量表上,一期骨合成组患者(188/68%)的优良结果比例高于其他两组(临时固定组为47%;确定性固定组为10%);在两种情况下差异均有统计学意义(分别为p < 0.001和p = 0.003)。

讨论 在本研究中,评估了手术治疗踝关节骨折的形态学和临床方面。将一期骨合成患者与临时或确定性固定治疗的患者进行了比较。大多数接受临时固定的患者有胫骨后缘骨折和严重的踝关节脱位,这表明骨和韧带结构受到严重损伤。一般来说,建议仅使用两根克氏针经跟骨和距骨插入胫骨远端。由于损伤严重,克氏针固定的患者通常需要更长的住院时间。

结论 不稳定踝关节骨折的首选治疗方法是一期骨合成。当由于患者的局部或全身健康状况,不稳定骨折在早期不能通过确定性骨合成治疗时,临时固定是一种有效的初始治疗方法。临时固定为软组织成功愈合提供了踝关节良好的对线。在临时固定治疗的患者中发现的创伤后踝关节骨关节炎、骨化和胫距关节远端融合发生率较高,更多地与患者所遭受的严重踝关节骨折类型有关,而非与方法本身有关。

关键词

不稳定踝关节骨折;软组织状况;固定指征;治疗结果

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验