Noll Lance W, Shridhar Pragathi B, Shi Xiaorong, An Baoyan, Cernicchiaro Natalia, Renter David G, Nagaraja Tiruvoor G, Bai Jianfa
1 Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University , Manhattan, Kansas.
2 Department of Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University , Manhattan, Kansas.
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015 Sep;12(9):787-94. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2015.1951. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
Several real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have been developed to detect and quantify Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7, but none have targeted the O-antigen specific gene (rfbEO157) in combination with the three major virulence genes, stx1, stx2, and eae. Our objectives were to develop and validate a four-plex, quantitative PCR (mqPCR) assay targeting rfbE(O157), stx1, stx2, and eae for the detection and quantification of STEC O157 in cattle feces, and compare the applicability of the assay to detect STEC O157 to a culture method and conventional PCR (cPCR) targeting the same four genes. Specificity of the mqPCR assay to differentially detect the four genes was confirmed with strains of O157 and non-O157 STEC with different profiles of target genes. In cattle feces spiked with pure cultures, detection limits were 2.8×10(4) and 2.8×10(0) colony-forming units/g before and after enrichment, respectively. Detection of STEC O157 in feedlot cattle fecal samples (n=278) was compared between mqPCR, cPCR, and a culture method. The mqPCR detected 48.9% (136/278) of samples as positive for E. coli O157. Of the 100 samples that were randomly picked from 136 mqPCR-positive samples, 35 and 48 tested positive by cPCR and culture method, respectively. Of the 100 samples randomly chosen from 142 mqPCR-negative samples, all were negative by cPCR, but 21 samples tested positive by the culture method. McNemar's chi-square tests indicated significant disagreement between the proportions of positive samples detected by the three methods. In conclusion, the mqPCR assay that targets four genes is a novel and more sensitive method than the cPCR or culture method to detect STEC O157 in cattle feces. However, the use of real-time PCR as a screening method to identify positive samples and then subjecting only positive samples to a culture method may underestimate the presence of STEC O157 in fecal samples.
已经开发了几种实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法来检测和定量产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)O157:H7,但尚无针对O抗原特异性基因(rfbEO157)并结合三个主要毒力基因stx1、stx2和eae的检测方法。我们的目标是开发并验证一种四重定量PCR(mqPCR)检测方法,该方法针对rfbE(O157)、stx1、stx2和eae,用于检测和定量牛粪便中的STEC O157,并将该检测方法检测STEC O157的适用性与一种培养方法和针对相同四个基因的常规PCR(cPCR)进行比较。通过具有不同靶基因谱的O157和非O157 STEC菌株,证实了mqPCR检测方法对这四个基因进行差异检测的特异性。在添加了纯培养物的牛粪便中,富集前后的检测限分别为2.8×10(4)和2.8×10(0)菌落形成单位/克。比较了mqPCR、cPCR和一种培养方法对饲养场牛粪便样本(n = 278)中STEC O157的检测情况。mqPCR检测到48.9%(136/278)的样本为大肠杆菌O157阳性。从136个mqPCR阳性样本中随机选取的100个样本中,分别有35个和48个通过cPCR和培养方法检测为阳性。从142个mqPCR阴性样本中随机选取的100个样本中,所有样本通过cPCR检测均为阴性,但有21个样本通过培养方法检测为阳性。McNemar卡方检验表明,三种方法检测到的阳性样本比例之间存在显著差异。总之,针对四个基因的mqPCR检测方法是一种新颖的、比cPCR或培养方法更灵敏的检测牛粪便中STEC O157的方法。然而,使用实时PCR作为筛选方法来鉴定阳性样本,然后仅对阳性样本进行培养方法检测,可能会低估粪便样本中STEC O157的存在情况。