Qin Xuan, Klein Eileen J, Galanakis Emmanouil, Thomas Anita A, Stapp Jennifer R, Rich Shannon, Buccat Anne Marie, Tarr Phillip I
Microbiology Laboratory, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2148-53. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00115-15. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
Timely accurate diagnosis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections is important. We evaluated a laboratory-developed real-time PCR (LD-PCR) assay targeting stx1, stx2, and rfbEO157 with 2,386 qualifying stool samples submitted to the microbiology laboratory of a tertiary care pediatric center between July 2011 and December 2013. Broth cultures of PCR-positive samples were tested for Shiga toxins by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (ImmunoCard STAT! enterohemorrhagic E. coli [EHEC]; Meridian Bioscience) and cultured in attempts to recover both O157 and non-O157 STEC. E. coli O157 and non-O157 STEC were detected in 35 and 18 cases, respectively. Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) occurred in 12 patients (10 infected with STEC O157, one infected with STEC O125ac, and one with PCR evidence of STEC but no resulting isolate). Among the 59 PCR-positive STEC specimens from 53 patients, only 29 (54.7%) of the associated specimens were toxin positive by EIA. LD-PCR differentiated STEC O157 from non-O157 using rfbEO157, and LD-PCR results prompted successful recovery of E. coli O157 (n = 25) and non-O157 STEC (n = 8) isolates, although the primary cultures and toxin assays were frequently negative. A rapid "mega"-multiplex PCR (FilmArray gastrointestinal panel; BioFire Diagnostics) was used retrospectively, and results correlated with LD-PCR findings in 25 (89%) of the 28 sorbitol-MacConkey agar culture-negative STEC cases. These findings demonstrate that PCR is more sensitive than EIA and/or culture and distinguishes between O157 and non-O157 STEC in clinical samples and that E. coli O157:H7 remains the predominant cause of HUS in our institution. PCR is highly recommended for rapid diagnosis of pediatric STEC infections.
及时准确地诊断产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)感染很重要。我们用实验室研发的实时聚合酶链反应(LD-PCR)检测法,对2011年7月至2013年12月期间提交至一家三级护理儿科中心微生物实验室的2386份合格粪便样本,检测stx1、stx2和rfbEO157。对PCR阳性样本的肉汤培养物进行酶免疫测定(EIA)(免疫卡STAT!肠出血性大肠杆菌[EHEC];子午线生物科学公司)检测志贺毒素,并进行培养以试图分离出O157和非O157 STEC。分别在35例和18例中检测到大肠杆菌O157和非O157 STEC。12例患者发生溶血尿毒综合征(HUS)(10例感染STEC O157,1例感染STEC O125ac,1例有STEC的PCR证据但未分离出菌株)。在来自53例患者的59份PCR阳性STEC标本中,只有29份(54.7%)相关标本经EIA检测毒素呈阳性。LD-PCR利用rfbEO157区分STEC O157和非O157,LD-PCR结果促使成功分离出大肠杆菌O157(n = 25)和非O157 STEC(n = 8)菌株,尽管初次培养和毒素检测结果常常为阴性。回顾性地使用了一种快速“超级”多重PCR(FilmArray胃肠道检测板;BioFire诊断公司),在28例山梨醇麦康凯琼脂培养阴性的STEC病例中,25例(89%)的结果与LD-PCR结果相关。这些发现表明,PCR比EIA和/或培养更敏感,能在临床样本中区分O157和非O157 STEC,并且大肠杆菌O157:H7仍然是我们机构中HUS的主要病因。强烈推荐使用PCR快速诊断儿科STEC感染。