Suppr超能文献

北美电力事业工作的体力要求。

The physical demands of electrical utilities work in North America.

作者信息

Meade Robert D, Lauzon Martin, Poirier Martin P, Flouris Andreas D, Kenny Glen P

机构信息

a Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , ON , Canada.

b FAME Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science , University of Thessaly , Trikala , Greece.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13(1):60-70. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1077966.

Abstract

We assessed the physical demands associated with electrical utilities work in North America and how they influence the level of thermal and cardiovascular strain experienced. Three common job categories were monitored as they are normally performed in thirty-two electrical utility workers: (i) Ground Work (n = 11), (ii) Bucket Work (n = 9), and (iii) Manual Pole Work (n = 12). Video analysis was performed to determine the proportion of the work monitoring period (duration: 187 ± 104 min) spent at different levels of physical effort (i.e., rest as well as light, moderate and heavy effort). Core and skin temperatures as well as heart rate were measured continuously. On average, workers spent 35.9 ± 15.9, 36.8 ± 17.8, 24.7 ± 12.8, and 2.6 ± 3.3% of the work period at rest and performing work classified as light, moderate, and heavy physical effort, respectively. Moreover, a greater proportion of the work period was spent performing heavy work in Ground Work (1.6 ± 1.4%) relative to Bucket Work (0.0 ± 0.0%; P<0.01) and in Manual Pole Climbing (5.5 ± 3.6%) in comparison to both other work job (both P≤0.03). Furthermore, the proportion of time spent during work classified as heavy physical effort was positively correlated to the mean (r = 0.51, P<0.01) and peak (r = 0.42, P = 0.02) core temperatures achieved during the work period as well as the mean heart rate response (presented as a percentage of heart rate reserve; r = 0.40, P = 0.03). Finally, mean and peak core temperatures and mean heart rate responses increased from the first to the second half of the work shift; however, no differences in the proportion of the work spent at the different intensity classifications were observed. We show that Manual Pole Work is associated with greater levels of physical effort compared to Ground or Bucket Work. Moreover, we suggest that the proportion of time spent performing work classified as heavy physical exertion is related to the level of thermal and cardiovascular strain experienced and that workers may not be employing self-pacing as a strategy to manage their level of physiological strain.

摘要

我们评估了北美电力公司工作中的体力需求,以及这些需求如何影响所经历的热应激和心血管应激水平。对32名电力公司工人正常执行的三种常见工作类别进行了监测:(i)地面工作(n = 11),(ii)斗臂车工作(n = 9),以及(iii)手动登杆工作(n = 12)。通过视频分析来确定在不同体力消耗水平(即休息以及轻度、中度和重度体力消耗)下所花费的工作监测期(时长:187±104分钟)的比例。连续测量核心温度、皮肤温度以及心率。平均而言,工人在休息以及从事被归类为轻度、中度和重度体力消耗的工作时,分别花费了工作期的35.9±15.9%、36.8±17.8%、24.7±12.8%和2.6±3.3%。此外,与斗臂车工作(0.0±0.0%;P<0.01)相比,地面工作中从事重度工作所花费的工作期比例更高(1.6±1.4%);与其他两种工作相比,手动登杆工作中从事重度工作所花费的时间比例更高(5.5±3.6%)(P均≤0.03)。此外,在被归类为重度体力消耗的工作期间所花费的时间比例与工作期间达到的平均核心温度(r = 0.51,P<0.01)和峰值核心温度(r = 0.42,P = 0.02)以及平均心率反应(以心率储备的百分比表示;r = 0.40,P = 0.03)呈正相关。最后,从工作班次的上半段到下半段,平均核心温度和峰值核心温度以及平均心率反应均有所上升;然而,在不同强度分类下所花费的工作比例没有差异。我们表明,与地面工作或斗臂车工作相比,手动登杆工作的体力消耗水平更高。此外,我们认为,从事被归类为重度体力消耗的工作所花费的时间比例与所经历的热应激和心血管应激水平有关,并且工人可能没有采用自我调节节奏作为管理其生理应激水平的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验