Redaèlli M, Simic D, Burtscher R, Mahmoodzad J, Schwitalla B, Kohlmeyer M, Mayer-Berger W
Department für Humanmedizin, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten.
Institut für Gesundheitsökonimie und Klinische Epidemiologie, Universität zu Köln.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2015 Aug;54(4):240-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555904. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
In Germany, the rehabilitative approaches towards patients with coronary artery events are not adequately sustainable despite the high costs. Both sustainability and cost effectiveness are the subjects of this 5-year analysis.
The study was initiated in 2004. One year recruiting phase was followed by 3 years aftercare with telephone as an intervention. This unicentric randomised controlled trial included 600 patients of rehabilitative aftercare (intervention group [IG] 271; control group [CG] 329). Data on (i) mortality, (ii) duration of retirement, (iii) type of retirement and (iv) status of retirement were obtained from the German Retirement Insurance.The analyses for cost-effectiveness are conducted for the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. The general assessment basis of retirements (partial and full disability pensions) are average values for the year 2013 (year of the measurement).
On the reporting date (31.12.2013), the values of the IG in part (early) retirement and full (early) retirement are higher than the CG (1.5 and 2.7%, n. s. and 7.4 and 13.4%, respectively n. s.). The same applies for mortality (8.1 and 9.4%, respectively n. s.).The savings through lower pension payments amount to € 1.55 million for the adjusted ITT approach. From this, € 130 080, which represents the cost of the aftercare (intervention), must be deducted.
The results of the 5-year follow-up show that a part of pension payment could be reduced. The evidence of cost effectiveness, independently of the methodological approach, is strong. The saving potential is reached by half in both approaches.
