Fechtner Stephanie, Bethge Matthias
Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck.
Faculty of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Mar;41(1):74-80. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000268.
Meta-analyses of rehabilitation studies in chronic back pain patients in Germany showed a lack of sustainability of rehabilitation programs. The German Pension Insurance therefore developed an intensified aftercare program to support rehabilitation outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare disability pension rates, income from regular employment, and duration of welfare benefits in patients with and without rehabilitation aftercare. We used administrative data on finished rehabilitation services. Patients were included if they were aged 18-60 years, had musculoskeletal disorders, and attended an outpatient or an inpatient rehabilitation program during the first term of 2007. Patients were excluded if they received an old-age pension, started a disability pension before January 2008, or died during the follow-up period. Patients with rehabilitation aftercare were matched by propensity scores with patients without rehabilitation aftercare. Estimation of the propensity score considered 20 potential confounders. There were no differences in the cumulative probability of receiving a disability pension. Moreover, patients with and without aftercare did not differ in their income from regular employment and the duration of different types of welfare benefits during the follow-up period. However, stratified analyses found a positive effect of an aftercare program on income in patients who attended a postacute rehabilitation program and patients who were at least 3 months absent because of sickness during the year preceding the initial rehabilitation program. Only patients with strong impairments benefit from attending an aftercare program. Allocation to aftercare programs and the focus on exercise only have to be reconsidered and revised.
德国针对慢性背痛患者康复研究的荟萃分析表明,康复项目缺乏可持续性。因此,德国养老保险机构制定了一项强化后续护理计划,以支持康复效果。本研究的目的是比较接受和未接受康复后续护理的患者的残疾抚恤金率、正常工作收入以及福利津贴持续时间。我们使用了已完成康复服务的管理数据。纳入的患者年龄在18至60岁之间,患有肌肉骨骼疾病,且在2007年第一学期参加了门诊或住院康复项目。如果患者领取养老金、在2008年1月之前开始领取残疾抚恤金或在随访期间死亡,则将其排除。接受康复后续护理的患者与未接受康复后续护理的患者按倾向得分进行匹配。倾向得分估计考虑了20个潜在混杂因素。在领取残疾抚恤金的累积概率方面没有差异。此外,在随访期间,接受和未接受后续护理的患者在正常工作收入以及不同类型福利津贴的持续时间方面也没有差异。然而,分层分析发现,后续护理计划对参加急性后康复项目的患者以及在初始康复项目前一年因病缺勤至少3个月的患者的收入有积极影响。只有严重受损的患者才能从参加后续护理计划中受益。必须重新考虑和修订后续护理计划的分配方式以及仅侧重于锻炼的做法。