Rufino Nascimento L G, Dehant P, Jimenez M, Dequeker J L, Castela E, Choussat A
Rev Port Cardiol. 1989 Jan;8(1):35-40.
To correlate QP/QS ratio determined by echo-Doppler with that obtained by cardiac catheterization (oximetric method) performed within 48 hours, in children with isolated septal defects.
The QP/QS ratio was evaluated by pulsed and or continuous wave echo-Doppler in 50 children who were submitted within 48 hours to cardiac catheterization. All children had an intracardiac shunt (12 atrial septal defects--ASD; 26 ventricular septal defects--VSD and 12 atrio ventricular septal defects--AVDS). Identical measurements were performed in a group of 20 children without cardiac malformation--control group. To test inter-observer variability, all the measurement in 31 patients were repeated by a second observer. Pulmonary and aortic flow was calculated as: Q = A x V x ET x CF where, A is the valvular orifice area (cm2), V the mean flow velocity (cm/sec), ET the ejection time (sec) and CF the cardiac frequency (cycles/min). The Doppler beam-flow direction angle in the pulmonary (P) artery and ascending aorta (Ao) was less than 20 degrees. Results were correlated with those obtained by catheterization (oximetric method).
We obtained a fairly good correlation with both pulsed wave Doppler (n = 43; r = 0.88; p less than 0.001; y = 0.84x + 0.40) and continuous wave Doppler (n = 50; r = 0.91; p less than 0.001; y = 0.86x + 0.35) or with pulsed wave Doppler in the P artery and continuous wave Doppler in the Ao (n = 43; r = 0.92; p less than 0.001; y = 0.86x + 0.27). In the control group, QP/QS ratio was evaluated by echo-Doppler: pulsed wave Doppler at 1.05 +/- 0.15 (mean +/- DS); continuous wave Doppler at 1.05 +/- 0.12 and, pulsed wave Doppler in the P artery and continuous wave Doppler in the Ao at 1.03 +/- 0.12. There was no significant difference in all three groups to the normal range of 1.00 (p less than 0.01). Inter-observer variability was less than 5.5% (p less than 0.001).
Pulsed and/or continuous wave echo-Doppler measurements are a reliable noninvasive method in evaluating QP/QS ratio in children with isolated septal defects.
在患有单纯性房间隔缺损的儿童中,将超声多普勒测定的QP/QS比值与48小时内通过心导管检查(血氧测定法)获得的比值进行相关性分析。
对50名在48小时内接受心导管检查的儿童,采用脉冲波和/或连续波超声多普勒评估QP/QS比值。所有儿童均有心脏内分流(12例房间隔缺损——ASD;26例室间隔缺损——VSD;12例房室间隔缺损——AVSD)。在一组20名无心脏畸形的儿童——对照组中进行相同测量。为测试观察者间的变异性,由第二名观察者对31例患者的所有测量进行重复。肺循环和主动脉血流量计算如下:Q = A×V×ET×CF,其中,A为瓣膜口面积(cm²),V为平均血流速度(cm/秒),ET为射血时间(秒),CF为心率(次/分钟)。肺动脉(P)和升主动脉(Ao)中的多普勒束流方向角小于20度。结果与通过心导管检查(血氧测定法)获得的结果进行相关性分析。
我们发现,脉冲波多普勒(n = 43;r = 0.88;p<0.001;y = 0.84x + 0.40)、连续波多普勒(n = 50;r = 0.91;p<0.001;y = 0.86x + 0.35),或者肺动脉中的脉冲波多普勒和主动脉中的连续波多普勒(n = 43;r = 0.92;p<0.001;y = 0.86x + 0.27)之间均具有相当好的相关性。在对照组中,通过超声多普勒评估QP/QS比值:脉冲波多普勒为1.05±0.15(均值±标准差);连续波多普勒为1.05±0.12;肺动脉中的脉冲波多普勒和主动脉中的连续波多普勒为1.03±0.12。三组与正常范围1.00相比均无显著差异(p<0.01)。观察者间变异性小于5.5%(p<0.001)。
脉冲波和/或连续波超声多普勒测量是评估单纯性房间隔缺损患儿QP/QS比值的可靠无创方法。