Suppr超能文献

连续流左心室辅助装置植入术后右心室辅助装置植入的术前预测因素及结果

Preoperative predictors and outcomes of right ventricular assist device implantation after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

作者信息

Patil Nikhil Prakash, Mohite Prashant N, Sabashnikov Anton, Dhar Dhruva, Weymann Alexander, Zeriouh Mohamed, Hards Rachel, Hedger Michael, De Robertis Fabio, Bahrami Toufan, Amrani Mohamed, Rahman-Haley Shelley, Banner Nicholas R, Popov Aron Frederik, Simon André Rüdiger

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;150(6):1651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.090. Epub 2015 Aug 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The outcomes of ventricular assist device therapy remain limited by right ventricular failure. We sought to define the predictors and evaluate the outcomes of right ventricular failure requiring right ventricular assist device support after long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

METHODS

Records of all continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients for the last 10 years were analyzed, including patients on preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and short-term ventricular assist device support. Perioperative clinical, echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and laboratory data of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients requiring right ventricular assist device support (right ventricular assist device group) were compared with the rest of the patient cohort (control group).

RESULTS

Between July 2003 and June 2013, 152 patients underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplantation. The overall postoperative incidence of right ventricular assist device support was 23.02% (n = 35). Right ventricular assist device implantation did not significantly affect eventual transplantation (P = .784) or longer-term survival (P = .870). Preoperative right ventricular diameter (P < .001), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P < .001), previous sternotomy (P = .002), preoperative short-term mechanical support (P = .005), left atrial diameter (P = .014), female gender (P = .020), age (P = .027), and preoperative bilirubin levels (P = .031) were univariate predictors of right ventricular assist device implantation. Multivariate analysis revealed lesser tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P = .013; odds ratio, 0.613; 95% confidence interval, 0.417-0.901) and smaller left atrial diameter (P = .007; odds ratio, 0.818; 95% confidence interval, 0.707-0.947) as independent predictors of right ventricular assist device implantation. Receiver operating characteristic curve of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion yielded an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.781-0.923), with cutoff tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion less than 12.5 mm having 84% sensitivity and 75% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesser tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and smaller left atrial diameter are independent predictors of the need for right ventricular assist device support after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Right ventricular assist device implantation does not adversely affect eventual transplantation or survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

摘要

目的

心室辅助装置治疗的效果仍受右心室衰竭的限制。我们试图确定长期植入连续血流左心室辅助装置后需要右心室辅助装置支持的右心室衰竭的预测因素,并评估其结果。

方法

分析过去10年所有连续血流左心室辅助装置接受者的记录,包括术前使用主动脉内球囊泵、体外膜肺氧合和短期心室辅助装置支持的患者。将需要右心室辅助装置支持的连续血流左心室辅助装置接受者(右心室辅助装置组)的围手术期临床、超声心动图、血流动力学和实验室数据与其余患者队列(对照组)进行比较。

结果

2003年7月至2013年6月,152例患者接受了连续血流左心室辅助装置植入作为移植桥梁。右心室辅助装置支持的总体术后发生率为23.02%(n = 35)。右心室辅助装置植入对最终移植(P = 0.784)或长期生存(P = 0.870)没有显著影响。术前右心室直径(P < 0.001)、三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(P < 0.001)、既往胸骨切开术(P = 0.002)、术前短期机械支持(P = 0.005)、左心房直径(P = 0.014)、女性性别(P = 0.020)、年龄(P = 0.027)和术前胆红素水平(P = 0.031)是右心室辅助装置植入的单因素预测因素。多因素分析显示,较小的三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(P = 0.013;比值比,0.613;95%置信区间,0.417 - 0.901)和较小的左心房直径(P = 0.007;比值比,0.818;95%置信区间,0.707 - 0.947)是右心室辅助装置植入的独立预测因素。三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.85(95%置信区间,0.781 - 0.923),三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移截断值小于12.5 mm时,敏感性为84%,特异性为75%。

结论

较小的三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移和较小的左心房直径是连续血流左心室辅助装置植入后需要右心室辅助装置支持的独立预测因素。右心室辅助装置植入对连续血流左心室辅助装置植入后的最终移植或生存没有不利影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验