Suppr超能文献

[使用DDD和VVI模式程控的双腔起搏器患者左心室功能(收缩时间间期)的无创评估]

[Non-invasive evaluation of left ventricular function (systolic time interval) in patients using double-chamber pacemakers programmed on DDD and VVI].

作者信息

Paisana F, Providência L A, Cristóvão J, Faria H, Pêgo M, Calisto J, Morais J, Andrade C, Monteiro V, Gouveia M L

出版信息

Rev Port Cardiol. 1989 May;8(5):367-70.

PMID:2631848
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes on left ventricular function as assessed by systolic time intervals (STI), by programming "physiological" pacemakers either on VVI or DDD mode.

STUDY DESIGN

Comparison of STI values--electromechanical systole (QS2); left ventricular ejection time (LVET); pre-ejection period (PEP); PEP/LVET--in patients submitted to double chamber pacing programmed in DDD or VVI mode.

SETTING

Cardiac Pacing Center in a Department of Cardiology at a University Hospital.

PATIENTS

We have studied 12 patients (3 men, 9 women), mean age 56.16 years (range 25-76 years) treated with double chamber pacing.

INTERVENTIONS

Initial measurements of STI in DDD or one week in VVI mode, and again after one week in DDD mode.

RESULTS

Significant changes were found after the first week in VVI pacing, versus baseline determination in DDD pacing, for LVET, PEP, and PEP/LVET (p less than 0.05). At the end of the second week (DDD pacing), there were also statistically significant differences for QS2 (P less than 0.05), LVET (P less than 0.01) and PEP/LVET (P less than 0.05) values when compared with the ones obtained in VVI pacing, at the end of the preceding week. No significant changes were found between the initial and the final STI determinations (both in DDD pacing).

CONCLUSION

We concluded for a better performance of the left ventricle at rest when "physiological" pacing is compared with VVI pacing.

摘要

目的

通过将“生理性”起搏器程控为VVI或DDD模式,评估收缩时间间期(STI)所测定的左心室功能变化。

研究设计

比较接受DDD或VVI模式双腔起搏患者的STI值——机电收缩期(QS2);左心室射血时间(LVET);射血前期(PEP);PEP/LVET。

地点

一所大学医院心内科的心脏起搏中心。

患者

我们研究了12例接受双腔起搏治疗的患者(3例男性,9例女性),平均年龄56.16岁(范围25 - 76岁)。

干预措施

在DDD模式下或VVI模式下一周后首次测量STI,然后在DDD模式下再过一周后再次测量。

结果

与DDD起搏时的基线测定相比,VVI起搏第一周后,LVET、PEP和PEP/LVET有显著变化(p<0.05)。在第二周结束时(DDD起搏),与前一周结束时VVI起搏所获得的值相比,QS2(P<0.05)、LVET(P<0.01)和PEP/LVET(P<0.05)值也有统计学显著差异。在初始和最终的STI测定之间(均为DDD起搏)未发现显著变化。

结论

我们得出结论,与VVI起搏相比,“生理性”起搏时左心室在静息状态下功能更佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验