Suppr超能文献

25%和50%肩胛下肌撕裂的重建:单锚定双褥式缝合足以进行重建。

Reconstruction of 25 and 50 % subscapularis tears: a single anchor with a double-mattress suture is sufficient for the reconstruction.

作者信息

Lorbach Olaf, Trennheuser Christian, Kieb Matthias, Efe Turgay, Kohn Dieter, Anagnostakos Konstantinos

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str, Geb. 37, 66421, Homburg (Saar), Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam/Bad Belzig, Germany.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3855-3862. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3767-5. Epub 2015 Aug 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluation of the biomechanical performance of repairs of 25 % (Fox/Romeo II) and 50 % (Fox/Romeo III) full-thickness subscapularis tears using a single-suture anchor.

METHODS

Six pairs of human cadaver specimens were used for the testing. Artificial subscapularis tears were created in order to simulate a 25 % (6) and a 50 % (6) full-thickness tear. The reconstructions were made with a double-loaded suture anchor (5.5-mm Bio-Corkscrew with two No. 2 Fiberwire) creating a double-mattress suture repair. Reconstructions were cyclically loaded from 10 to 60 N. The load was increased stepwise up to 100 and 180 N. Cyclic displacement (means + standard dev.) as well as load-to-failure was determined, and mode of failure was recorded.

RESULTS

In the reconstructed shoulders at 60 N, a mean cyclic displacement of 3.2 ± 0.7 mm was found in the 25 % tear, 2.6 ± 0.6 mm in the 50 % tear. At 100 N, 5.1 ± 1.2 mm was seen in the 25 % tear and 4.3 ± 0.3 mm in the 50 % tear. At highest load of 180 N, 7.6 ± 2.2 mm was recorded in the 25 % tear, 6.5 ± 0.8 mm was found in the 50 % tear. Ultimate failure load was 486 ± 167 N in the 25 % tear and 455 ± 213 N in the 50 % tear. Statistically significant differences between the tested repairs were seen neither in cyclic displacement nor in ultimate failure loads (p > 0.05). Mode of failure revealed bone fractures and anchor pull-out as major cause in the 25 % group, whereas failure of the suture-tendon interface was the major cause of failure in the 50 % group.

CONCLUSIONS

Subscapularis repair using a single double-loaded suture anchor revealed similar biomechanical performance in 25 % compared to 50 % full-thickness subscapularis tears. With increased tear size, however, an optimized suture-tendon interface seems to become more relevant in order to decrease failure rate of the repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A single double-loaded suture anchor provides sufficient biomechanical strength even in Fox/Romeo grade III tears of the subscapularis tendon. However, a modified suture configuration is recommended, especially in grade III tears as the suture-tendon interface is the weakest point of the construct.

摘要

目的

使用单缝线锚钉评估25%(Fox/Romeo II型)和50%(Fox/Romeo III型)全层肩胛下肌撕裂修补的生物力学性能。

方法

使用6对人体尸体标本进行测试。制造人工肩胛下肌撕裂以模拟25%(6例)和50%(6例)全层撕裂。使用双负载缝线锚钉(5.5毫米Bio-Corkscrew搭配两根2号Fiberwire缝线)进行重建,形成双褥式缝线修补。重建结构从10牛循环加载至60牛。载荷逐步增加至100牛和180牛。测定循环位移(均值±标准差)以及失效载荷,并记录失效模式。

结果

在60牛时,25%撕裂的重建肩部平均循环位移为3.2±0.7毫米,50%撕裂的为2.6±0.6毫米。在100牛时,25%撕裂的为5.1±1.2毫米,50%撕裂的为4.3±0.3毫米。在180牛的最高载荷下,25%撕裂的记录为7.6±2.2毫米,50%撕裂的为6.5±0.8毫米。25%撕裂的极限失效载荷为486±167牛,50%撕裂的为455±213牛。在测试的修补之间,无论是循环位移还是极限失效载荷均未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。失效模式显示,25%组骨折和锚钉拔出为主要原因,而50%组缝线-肌腱界面失效是主要失效原因。

结论

使用单个双负载缝线锚钉进行肩胛下肌修补,25%全层肩胛下肌撕裂与50%全层肩胛下肌撕裂相比,显示出相似的生物力学性能。然而,随着撕裂尺寸增加,优化缝线-肌腱界面似乎对于降低修补失败率更为重要。

临床意义

单个双负载缝线锚钉即使在肩胛下肌腱的Fox/Romeo III级撕裂中也能提供足够的生物力学强度。然而,建议采用改良的缝线配置,特别是在III级撕裂中,因为缝线-肌腱界面是结构中最薄弱的点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验