Oliveira J A, Lousada N, da Silva N, Bernardes L, Quininha J, Salomão S
Rev Port Cardiol. 1989 Jun;8(6):443-6.
Prospective study involving subjects without heart disease and patients with coronary artery disease.
Cardiology Department of the Hospitais Civis de Lisboa--Hospital de S. Marta.
We studied: A - 30 normal volunteers; B - 43 patients (pt) with coronary artery disease documented by coronary angiography.
Two-Dimensional Echocardiography was performed in all subjects. MSA was measured in early diastole using the apical four-chamber view. Using the same view IMLC was assessed. Echo pulsed Doppler was used to detect the presence of MR. All patients in group B were submitted to cardiac catheterization. EDLVP was measured and left ventriculography and coronary arteriography were performed. Presence of MR was assessed and ejection fraction (EF) calculated. According to EF patients were divided: Group B1 (EF greater than 50 - 23 pt); Group B2 (EF 35-50% - 11 pt); Group B3 (EF less than 35% - 9 pt).
In group A MSA was always less than 30 degrees and IMLC was never observed. In group B pt with EF greater than 50% had MSA less than 30 degrees in all but one case. Patients with EF less than 50% had MSA superior to 30 degrees in all but two cases. MSA superior to 45 degrees was found in 2 pt with EF 35-50% and in 5 pt with EF less than 35%. IMLC was detected in 11 pt. Only 2 pt had MR and 7 had EDLVP greater than 18 mmHg - 15 pt had an elevated EDLVP in the whole group. IMLC was frequent in group B3 - 7 pt. Correlation between MSA and EF was good (r = -0.81). Sensitivity and specificity of MSA in the separation of pt with EF superior and inferior to 50% was 90% and 95%, respectively: they dropped when we tried to separate pt with EF superior and inferior to 35% (sensitivity 55%, specificity 77%).
IMLC didn't correlate with the existence of MR or elevated EDLVP; it appears, however, to be associated with poor left ventricular function (EF less than 35%). MSA is a good echocardiographic index of left ventricular in patients with coronary artery disease. It is easily measured and it can be a good alternative to mitral E point septal separation in patients in which left sternal views are difficult or impossible.
一项涉及无心脏病受试者和冠心病患者的前瞻性研究。
里斯本市民医院——圣马尔塔医院心内科。
我们研究了:A组——30名正常志愿者;B组——43例经冠状动脉造影证实患有冠心病的患者(pt)。
对所有受试者进行二维超声心动图检查。使用心尖四腔心切面在舒张早期测量MSA。使用同一切面评估IMLC。采用回声脉冲多普勒检测MR的存在。B组所有患者均接受心导管检查。测量EDLVP,并进行左心室造影和冠状动脉造影。评估MR的存在并计算射血分数(EF)。根据EF将患者分为:B1组(EF大于50%——23例);B2组(EF为35%-50%——11例);B3组(EF小于35%——9例)。
A组中MSA始终小于30度,且从未观察到IMLC。B组中EF大于50%的患者除1例外在所有病例中MSA均小于30度。EF小于50%的患者除2例外在所有病例中MSA均大于30度。在2例EF为35%-50%的患者和5例EF小于35%的患者中发现MSA大于45度。在11例患者中检测到IMLC。仅2例患者有MR,7例患者EDLVP大于18 mmHg——全组有15例患者EDLVP升高。IMLC在B3组中很常见——7例。MSA与EF之间的相关性良好(r = -0.81)。MSA在区分EF大于和小于50%的患者时的敏感性和特异性分别为90%和95%:当我们试图区分EF大于和小于35%的患者时,它们有所下降(敏感性55%,特异性77%)。
IMLC与MR的存在或EDLVP升高无关;然而,它似乎与左心室功能不良(EF小于35%)有关。MSA是冠心病患者左心室功能的一个良好超声心动图指标。它易于测量,对于难以或无法获得左胸骨旁切面的患者,它可以是二尖瓣E点-室间隔距离的一个很好的替代指标。