Suppr超能文献

阿替利珠单抗治疗成人脑卒中和创伤性脑损伤后上肢痉挛性偏瘫的安全性和有效性:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Safety and efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA for hemiparesis in adults with upper limb spasticity after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

EA 7377 BIOTN, Université Paris-Est, Hospital Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor, Service de Rééducation Neurolocomotrice, Créteil, France.

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Neurol. 2015 Oct;14(10):992-1001. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00216-1. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resistance from antagonistic muscle groups might be a crucial factor reducing function in chronic hemiparesis. The resistance due to spastic co-contraction might be reduced by botulinum toxin injections. We assessed the effects of abobotulinumtoxinA injection in the upper limb muscles on muscle tone, spasticity, active movement, and function.

METHODS

In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we enrolled adults (aged 18-80 years) at least 6 months after stroke or brain trauma from 34 neurology or rehabilitation clinics in Europe and the USA. Eligible participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio with a computer-generated list to receive a single injection session of abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U or 1000 U or placebo into the most hypertonic muscle group among the elbow, wrist, or finger flexors (primary target muscle group [PTMG]), and into at least two additional muscle groups from the elbow, wrist, or finger flexors or shoulder extensors. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the change in muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS]) in the PTMG from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary endpoints were Physician Global Assessment (PGA) at week 4 and change from baseline to 4 weeks in the perceived function (Disability Assessment Scale [DAS]) in the principal target of treatment, selected by the patient together with physician from four functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position, and pain). Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01313299.

FINDINGS

243 patients were randomly allocated to placebo (n=81), abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U (n=81), or abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U (n=81). Mean change in MAS score from baseline at week 4 in the PTMG was -0·3 (SD 0·6) in the placebo group (n=79), -1·2 (1·0) in the abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U group (n=80; difference -0·9, 95% CI -1·2 to -0·6; p<0·0001 vs placebo), and -1·4 (1·1) in the abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U group (n=79; -1·1, -1·4 to -0·8; p<0·0001 vs placebo). Mean PGA score at week 4 was 0·6 (SD 1·0) in the placebo group (n=78), 1·4 (1·1) in the abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U group (n=80; p=0·0003 vs placebo), and 1·8 (1·1) in the abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U group (n=78; p<0·0001 vs placebo). Mean change from baseline at week 4 in DAS score for the principal target of treatment was -0·5 (0·7) in the placebo group (n=79), -0·7 (0·8) in the abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U group (n=80; p=0·2560 vs placebo), and -0·7 (0·7) in the abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U group (n=78; p=0·0772 vs placebo). Three serious adverse events occurred in each group and none were treatment related; two resulted in death (from pulmonary oedema in the placebo group and a pre-existing unspecified cardiovascular disorder in the abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U group). Adverse events that were thought to be treatment related occurred in two (2%), six (7%), and seven (9%) patients in the placebo, abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U, and abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U groups, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse event was mild muscle weakness. All adverse events were mild or moderate.

INTERPRETATION

AbobotulinumtoxinA at doses of 500 U or 1000 U injected into upper limb muscles provided tone reduction and clinical benefit in hemiparesis. Future research into the treatment of spastic paresis with botulinum toxin should use active movement and function as primary outcome measures.

FUNDING

Ipsen.

摘要

背景

拮抗肌的阻力可能是导致慢性偏瘫功能下降的关键因素。通过肉毒杆菌毒素注射可以减少由痉挛性共收缩引起的阻力。我们评估了在上肢肌肉中注射阿博特毒素 A 对肌肉张力、痉挛、主动运动和功能的影响。

方法

在这项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究中,我们从欧洲和美国的 34 个神经病学或康复诊所招募了至少在中风或脑外伤后 6 个月的成年人(年龄 18-80 岁)。符合条件的参与者以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配,使用计算机生成的列表接受单次注射阿博特毒素 A 500U 或 1000U 或安慰剂,注射部位为肘、腕或手指屈肌中最紧张的肌肉群(主要目标肌肉群[PTMG]),以及肘、腕或手指屈肌或肩伸肌中的至少两个额外肌肉群。患者和研究者对治疗分配均不知情。主要终点是 PTMG 从基线到 4 周时肌肉张力(改良 Ashworth 量表[MAS])的变化。次要终点是第 4 周时医生总体评估(PGA)和从基线到第 4 周时主要治疗目标(患者与医生一起从四个功能领域选择)感知功能(残疾评估量表[DAS])的变化)。分析按意向治疗进行。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01313299。

结果

243 名患者被随机分配至安慰剂组(n=81)、阿博特毒素 A 500U 组(n=81)或阿博特毒素 A 1000U 组(n=81)。PTMG 从基线到第 4 周时 MAS 评分的平均变化在安慰剂组为-0.3(SD 0.6)(n=79),阿博特毒素 A 500U 组为-1.2(1.0)(n=80;差值-0.9,95%CI-1.2 至-0.6;p<0.0001 与安慰剂相比),阿博特毒素 A 1000U 组为-1.4(1.1)(n=79;-1.1,-1.4 至-0.8;p<0.0001 与安慰剂相比)。第 4 周时 PGA 评分的平均变化在安慰剂组为 0.6(SD 1.0)(n=78),阿博特毒素 A 500U 组为 1.4(1.1)(n=80;p=0.0003 与安慰剂相比),阿博特毒素 A 1000U 组为 1.8(1.1)(n=78;p<0.0001 与安慰剂相比)。从第 4 周的基线到主要治疗目标的 DAS 评分的平均变化在安慰剂组为-0.5(0.7)(n=79),阿博特毒素 A 500U 组为-0.7(0.8)(n=80;p=0.2560 与安慰剂相比),阿博特毒素 A 1000U 组为-0.7(0.7)(n=78;p=0.0772 与安慰剂相比)。每组各发生 3 例严重不良事件,均与治疗无关;其中 2 例导致死亡(安慰剂组发生肺水肿,阿博特毒素 A 500U 组发生先前未指定的心血管疾病)。认为与治疗相关的不良事件分别发生在 2%(2 例)、7%(6 例)和 9%(7 例)的安慰剂、阿博特毒素 A 500U 和阿博特毒素 A 1000U 组患者中。最常见的与治疗相关的不良事件是轻度肌肉无力。所有不良事件均为轻度或中度。

结论

在上肢肌肉中注射阿博特毒素 A 500U 或 1000U 可降低肌张力并改善偏瘫患者的临床疗效。未来使用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗痉挛性弛缓应将主动运动和功能作为主要的疗效指标。

资金来源

Ipsen。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验