Tappenden Kelly A
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Sep;115(9):1486-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.372.
In 2014, recognizing the need to have a single document to guide scientific decision making at the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy), the Council on Research was charged with developing a scientific integrity policy for the organization. From the Council on Research, four members volunteered to lead this workgroup, which reviewed the literature and best practices for scientific integrity from well-respected organizations, including federal funders of research. It became clear that the scope of this document would be quite broad, given the many scientific activities the Academy is involved in, and that it would be unreasonable to set policy for each of these many situations. Therefore, the workgroup set about defining the scope of scientific activities to be covered and envisioned a set of guiding principles, to which policies from every organizational unit of the Academy could be compared to ensure they were in alignment. While many relevant policies exist already, such as the requirement of a signed conflict of interest disclosure for Food & Nutrition Conference & Expo speakers, the Evidence Analysis Library funding policy, and the Academy's sponsorship policy, the scientific integrity principals are unique in that they provide a unifying vision to which future policies can be compared and approved based on their alignment with the principles. The six principles outlined in this article were approved by the full Council on Research in January 2015 and approved by the Academy's Board of Directors in March 2015. This article covers the scope of the principles, presents the principles and existing related resources, and outlines next steps for the Academy to review and revise current policies and create new ones in alignment with these principles.
2014年,营养与饮食学会(学会)认识到需要有一份单一文件来指导科学决策,研究委员会受命为该组织制定一项科学诚信政策。研究委员会中有四名成员自愿领导这个工作组,该工作组审查了包括联邦研究资助机构在内的备受尊敬的组织在科学诚信方面的文献和最佳实践。鉴于学会参与的众多科学活动,很明显这份文件的范围将相当广泛,而且为这么多情况逐一制定政策是不合理的。因此,工作组着手界定拟涵盖的科学活动范围,并设想了一套指导原则,学会的每个组织单位的政策都可与之对照,以确保它们保持一致。虽然已经存在许多相关政策,如要求食品与营养会议暨博览会的演讲者签署利益冲突披露声明、证据分析图书馆的资助政策以及学会的赞助政策,但科学诚信原则的独特之处在于,它们提供了一个统一的愿景,未来的政策可据此对照,并根据与这些原则的一致性来批准。本文概述的六项原则于2015年1月获得研究委员会全体成员批准,并于2015年3月获得学会董事会批准。本文涵盖了这些原则的范围,介绍了这些原则及现有的相关资源,并概述了学会审查和修订现行政策以及根据这些原则制定新政策的后续步骤。