Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
J Nutr. 2022 Aug 9;152(8):1812-1818. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac106.
Although the food and beverage industry plays a critical role in advancing food and nutrition science, industry-funded research is subject to intense scrutiny as a result of various perceived and real biases related to funding sources. To address this, the Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS) Assembly on Scientific Integrity has updated its Guiding Principles for Funding Food Science and Nutrition Research to provide a modernized framework for minimizing bias and promoting integrity in industry-funded research. Existing best practices for managing conflicts and maintaining trust in science, as well as coverage related to conflicts in industry-funded research, were reviewed to inform the development of the updated Guiding Principles. The updated Guiding Principles continue to provide conflict-of-interest guidelines to protect the integrity and credibility of the scientific record. These updates provide clarification, strengthen the guardrails that separate the funding from the science, and reflect the shift within the scientific community toward increased transparency and open science. If the principles are followed as intended, there should be little reason to dispute the results of industry-funded studies, other than to debate the science itself. This article issues a challenge to the research community to strive for just that.
虽然食品和饮料行业在推进食品和营养科学方面发挥着关键作用,但由于与资金来源有关的各种感知和实际偏见,行业资助的研究受到了严格审查。为了解决这个问题,推进食品和营养科学学会(IAFNS)科学诚信大会更新了其资助食品科学和营养研究的指导原则,为最小化行业资助研究中的偏见和促进诚信提供了一个现代化的框架。现有的管理冲突和维护科学信任的最佳实践,以及与行业资助研究中的冲突相关的报道,都被审查以提供信息来制定更新后的指导原则。更新后的指导原则继续提供利益冲突准则,以保护科学记录的完整性和可信度。这些更新提供了澄清,加强了将资金与科学分开的护栏,并反映了科学界朝着提高透明度和开放科学的方向转变。如果这些原则得到妥善遵循,除了对科学本身进行辩论外,应该没有理由对行业资助研究的结果提出争议。本文向研究界提出了一个挑战,即努力实现这一目标。