Suppr超能文献

更新的食品与营养研究产业资助框架:管理财务冲突和科学诚信

An Updated Framework for Industry Funding of Food and Nutrition Research: Managing Financial Conflicts and Scientific Integrity.

机构信息

Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.

Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr. 2022 Aug 9;152(8):1812-1818. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac106.

Abstract

Although the food and beverage industry plays a critical role in advancing food and nutrition science, industry-funded research is subject to intense scrutiny as a result of various perceived and real biases related to funding sources. To address this, the Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS) Assembly on Scientific Integrity has updated its Guiding Principles for Funding Food Science and Nutrition Research to provide a modernized framework for minimizing bias and promoting integrity in industry-funded research. Existing best practices for managing conflicts and maintaining trust in science, as well as coverage related to conflicts in industry-funded research, were reviewed to inform the development of the updated Guiding Principles. The updated Guiding Principles continue to provide conflict-of-interest guidelines to protect the integrity and credibility of the scientific record. These updates provide clarification, strengthen the guardrails that separate the funding from the science, and reflect the shift within the scientific community toward increased transparency and open science. If the principles are followed as intended, there should be little reason to dispute the results of industry-funded studies, other than to debate the science itself. This article issues a challenge to the research community to strive for just that.

摘要

虽然食品和饮料行业在推进食品和营养科学方面发挥着关键作用,但由于与资金来源有关的各种感知和实际偏见,行业资助的研究受到了严格审查。为了解决这个问题,推进食品和营养科学学会(IAFNS)科学诚信大会更新了其资助食品科学和营养研究的指导原则,为最小化行业资助研究中的偏见和促进诚信提供了一个现代化的框架。现有的管理冲突和维护科学信任的最佳实践,以及与行业资助研究中的冲突相关的报道,都被审查以提供信息来制定更新后的指导原则。更新后的指导原则继续提供利益冲突准则,以保护科学记录的完整性和可信度。这些更新提供了澄清,加强了将资金与科学分开的护栏,并反映了科学界朝着提高透明度和开放科学的方向转变。如果这些原则得到妥善遵循,除了对科学本身进行辩论外,应该没有理由对行业资助研究的结果提出争议。本文向研究界提出了一个挑战,即努力实现这一目标。

相似文献

2
Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 May;89(5):1285-91. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27604. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
3
Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity.
J Nutr. 2009 Jun;139(6):1051-3. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.105668. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
4
Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity.
Nutr Rev. 2009 May;67(5):264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00188.x.
5
Managing Conflicts and Maximizing Transparency in Industry-Funded Research.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Oct-Dec;11(4):223-232. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1798562. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
The alcohol industry and public interest science.
Addiction. 2010 Feb;105(2):191-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02688.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of investigator bias in nutrition research.
Front Nutr. 2025 Apr 17;12:1513343. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1513343. eCollection 2025.
3
Advice to early career nutritionists on working in and with the food industry.
Nutr Bull. 2025 Mar;50(1):151-160. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12730. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
5
Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition: Categorical Thinking and the Stigma of Commercial Collaboration.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Jul 17;8(8):104413. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104413. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
The Evolution of Science and Regulation of Dietary Supplements: Past, Present, and Future.
J Nutr. 2024 Aug;154(8):2335-2345. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.06.017. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
8
Perspective: Examining Conflicts of Interest for Professional Service within the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee.
Adv Nutr. 2023 May;14(3):432-437. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
9
Principles of engagement on research and other collaborations between the brewing sector and research entities: the FACT Principles.
Br J Nutr. 2023 Oct 28;130(8):1429-1436. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523000533. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Is There an Academic Bias against Low-Energy Sweeteners?
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 29;14(7):1428. doi: 10.3390/nu14071428.
2
The Strategic Council for Research Excellence, Integrity, and Trust.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 12;118(41). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116647118.
4
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond.
PLoS Biol. 2019 May 1;17(5):e3000246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246. eCollection 2019 May.
7
Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):327-355. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
Best practices in nutrition science to earn and keep the public's trust.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;109(1):225-243. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy337.
10
Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Research-Reply.
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):94-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5678.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验