Perry Yaron, Towe Christopher W, Kwong Jonathan, Ho Vanessa P, Linden Philip A
Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;100(6):2041-6; discussion 2046-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.092. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy are a significant cause of postoperative morbidity and death. Barium esophagram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy are commonly used to survey for leaks; however, each has inherent risks and limitations. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of daily drain amylase levels in detecting anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.
We retrospectively reviewed 146 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with cervical and intrathoracic anastomosis using gastric conduit. We collected daily drain amylase levels and obtained postoperative barium esophagrams routinely. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of drain amylase to detect anastomotic leaks and to determine the sensitivity and specificity at various cutoff values.
There were no in-hospital or outpatient deaths within 30 days of operation in this consecutive series of patients. A leak occurred in 22 of 146 esophagectomy patients (15%) that required postoperative intervention. An additional 13 patients (9%) had a leak requiring only alteration of diet or antibiotics. The sensitivity and specificity for barium esophagram was 36.9% and 95%, respectively. For drain amylase obtained on postoperative day 4, a cutoff of 38 IU/L yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 52.0%, and a cutoff of 250 IU/L yielded a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 95.9% in detecting leaks eventually requiring intervention.
Drain amylase levels recorded on day 4 after esophagectomy are more accurate for the detection of esophageal anastomotic leak than barium esophagram. Drain amylase levels represent a noninvasive test that may facilitate safe, early discharge after esophagectomy.
食管切除术后吻合口漏是术后发病和死亡的重要原因。食管钡餐造影和食管胃十二指肠镜检查常用于检测吻合口漏;然而,每种方法都有其固有的风险和局限性。我们旨在评估每日引流液淀粉酶水平在检测食管切除术后吻合口漏方面的有效性。
我们回顾性分析了146例连续接受食管切除术并使用胃代食管行颈部和胸内吻合的患者。我们收集了每日引流液淀粉酶水平,并常规进行术后食管钡餐造影。进行受试者操作特征分析,以评估引流液淀粉酶检测吻合口漏的能力,并确定不同临界值下的敏感性和特异性。
在这一系列连续患者中,术后30天内无住院或门诊死亡病例。146例食管切除患者中有22例(15%)发生吻合口漏,需要术后干预。另外13例患者(9%)发生吻合口漏,仅需调整饮食或使用抗生素。食管钡餐造影的敏感性和特异性分别为36.9%和95%。对于术后第4天获得的引流液淀粉酶,在检测最终需要干预的吻合口漏时,临界值为38 IU/L时敏感性为100%,特异性为52.0%;临界值为250 IU/L时敏感性为66.7%,特异性为95.9%。
食管切除术后第4天记录的引流液淀粉酶水平在检测食管吻合口漏方面比食管钡餐造影更准确。引流液淀粉酶水平代表一种无创检查,可能有助于食管切除术后安全、早期出院。