Roh Simon, Iannettoni Mark D, Keech John C, Bashir Mohammad, Gruber Peter J, Parekh Kalpaj R
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;49(2):99-106. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.2.99. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
Barium swallow is performed following esophagectomy to evaluate the anastomosis for detection of leaks and to assess the emptying of the gastric conduit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the barium swallow study in diagnosing anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy.
Patients who underwent esophagectomy from January 2000 to December 2013 at our institution were investigated. Barium swallow was routinely done between days 5-7 to detect a leak. These results were compared to clinically determined leaks (defined by neck wound infection requiring jejunal feeds and or parenteral nutrition) during the postoperative period. The sensitivity and specificity of barium swallow in diagnosing clinically significant anastomotic leaks was determined.
A total of 395 esophagectomies were performed (mean age, 62.2 years). The indications for the esophagectomy were as follows: malignancy (n=320), high-grade dysplasia (n=14), perforation (n=27), benign stricture (n=7), achalasia (n=16), and other (n=11). A variety of techniques were used including transhiatal (n=351), McKeown (n=35), and Ivor Lewis (n=9) esophagectomies. Operative mortality was 2.8% (n=11). Three hundred and sixty-eight patients (93%) underwent barium swallow study after esophagectomy. Clinically significant anastomotic leak was identified in 36 patients (9.8%). Barium swallow was able to detect only 13/36 clinically significant leaks. The sensitivity of the swallow in diagnosing a leak was 36% and specificity was 97%. The positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow study in detecting leaks were 59% and 93%, respectively.
Barium swallow is an insensitive but specific test for detecting leaks at the cervical anastomotic site after esophagectomy.
食管切除术后进行吞钡检查以评估吻合口有无漏口,并评估胃代食管的排空情况。本研究的目的是评估吞钡检查在诊断食管切除术后吻合口漏方面的可靠性。
对2000年1月至2013年12月在我院接受食管切除术的患者进行调查。常规在术后第5至7天进行吞钡检查以检测漏口。将这些结果与术后临床确定的漏口(定义为需要空肠喂养和/或肠外营养的颈部伤口感染)进行比较。确定吞钡检查在诊断具有临床意义的吻合口漏方面的敏感性和特异性。
共进行了395例食管切除术(平均年龄62.2岁)。食管切除术的适应证如下:恶性肿瘤(n = 320)、高级别发育异常(n = 14)、穿孔(n = 27)、良性狭窄(n = 7)、贲门失弛缓症(n = 16)和其他(n = 11)。采用了多种技术,包括经裂孔(n = 351)、麦克尤恩(n = 35)和艾弗·刘易斯(n = 9)食管切除术。手术死亡率为2.8%(n = 11)。368例患者(93%)在食管切除术后接受了吞钡检查。36例患者(9.8%)被确定存在具有临床意义的吻合口漏。吞钡检查仅能检测出36例具有临床意义的漏口中的13例。吞钡检查诊断漏口的敏感性为36%,特异性为97%。吞钡检查检测漏口的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为59%和93%。
吞钡检查在检测食管切除术后颈部吻合口漏方面是一种不敏感但具有特异性的检查。