Patrini Davide, Lawrence David, Adams Benjamin, Panagiotopoulos Nikolaos
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Hospital, University College London Hospital (UCLH), London, UK
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Hospital, University College London Hospital (UCLH), London, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;21(5):677-81. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv242. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in high-risk patients undergoing sublobar resection for non-small-cell lung cancer, is brachytherapy effective in reducing local recurrence? Altogether, 60 papers were found using the reported search, of which 6 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Three papers are prospective non-randomized studies, two are retrospective and one is a prospective randomized clinical trial. The first prospective non-randomized study included 14 patients treated with sublobar resection plus brachytherapy. No local recurrence was observed. In the second study, 33 patients underwent sublobar resection plus brachytherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of which 10 patients had recurrences. In the third study, 110 patients with Stage IA and IB NSCLC underwent sublobar resection and brachytherapy, of which 3 local recurrences and 1 combined local and regional recurrence were observed. Two retrospective studies were considered. The first study compared 102 patients undergoing sublobar resection with 101 patients undergoing surgery and brachytherapy. There were 19 recurrences in the surgical resection group (18.6%) and 2 recurrences in the adjuvant brachytherapy arm (2%). In the second study, 214 patients undergoing segmentectomy for Stage I NSCLC, were compared with 155 patients undergoing segmentectomy plus brachytherapy. Adding brachytherapy did not appear to have an effect on local recurrence in patients undergoing anatomical segmentectomy (4.6 vs 6.4%). In the prospective randomized trial, 108 patients with Stage I NSCLC were randomized to sublobar resection, and 104 to sublobar resection and brachytherapy. No statistical difference between the two groups was observed in terms of local recurrence. However, in the latter group, 14 patients had a positive staple line, and this group represented the strongest evidence that brachytherapy effectively reduced local recurrence. There may be a role for adjuvant brachytherapy in reducing the local recurrence when sublobar non-anatomical resections are performed and in cases where the surgical margins are compromised. Brachytherapy appears not to affect local control when an anatomical resection is performed with adequate margins.
根据结构化方案撰写了一篇胸外科最佳证据主题。所探讨的问题是:在接受非小细胞肺癌亚肺叶切除的高危患者中,近距离放射治疗在降低局部复发方面是否有效?通过报告的检索共找到60篇论文,其中6篇代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。这些论文的作者、期刊、出版日期和国家、研究的患者组、研究类型、相关结果和结果以表格形式列出。3篇论文是前瞻性非随机研究,2篇是回顾性研究,1篇是前瞻性随机临床试验。第一项前瞻性非随机研究纳入了14例接受亚肺叶切除加近距离放射治疗的患者。未观察到局部复发。在第二项研究中,33例患者接受了非小细胞肺癌亚肺叶切除加近距离放射治疗,其中10例患者复发。在第三项研究中,110例IA期和IB期非小细胞肺癌患者接受了亚肺叶切除和近距离放射治疗,观察到3例局部复发和1例局部及区域联合复发。考虑了两项回顾性研究。第一项研究将102例接受亚肺叶切除的患者与101例接受手术和近距离放射治疗的患者进行了比较。手术切除组有19例复发(18.6%),辅助近距离放射治疗组有2例复发(2%)。在第二项研究中,将214例接受I期非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术的患者与155例接受肺段切除加近距离放射治疗的患者进行了比较。在接受解剖性肺段切除的患者中,添加近距离放射治疗似乎对局部复发没有影响(4.6%对6.4%)。在前瞻性随机试验中,108例I期非小细胞肺癌患者被随机分配接受亚肺叶切除,104例被分配接受亚肺叶切除和近距离放射治疗。两组在局部复发方面未观察到统计学差异。然而,在后一组中,14例患者吻合钉线阳性,该组代表了近距离放射治疗有效降低局部复发的最有力证据。当进行亚肺叶非解剖性切除且手术切缘受到影响时,辅助近距离放射治疗在降低局部复发方面可能有作用。当进行具有足够切缘的解剖性切除时,近距离放射治疗似乎不影响局部控制。